← 返回前沿论文

NY-ESO-1 在三阴性乳腺癌中的系统评价、Meta 分析及免疫治疗意义

英文原题:NY-ESO-1 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Immunotherapeutic Implications.

查看英文原题

NY-ESO-1 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Immunotherapeutic Implications.

PubMed 2026/03/16(内容时间) Int Immunopharmacol Q1 · IF 5.6(JCR 2025)

研究概要

一项纳入12项研究、共1,545例TNBC患者的系统meta分析显示,NY-ESO-1表达的合并阳性率为16.1%(95% CI:11.4-22.2%),异质性(I 2 =83.7%)可归因于用于NY-ESO-1检测的抗体克隆(E978:15.1% vs.

中文摘要

乳腺癌仍然是最常见的癌症类型之一,其中包括三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)亚型,由于其侵袭性而难以治疗。癌症-睾丸抗原(CTAs),尤其是纽约食管鳞状细胞癌1(NY-ESO-1),已成为有前景的免疫治疗靶点,因为其在正常组织中表达受限,但在TNBC中过表达,从而具有免疫原性。本综述全面讨论了NY-ESO-1,包括其被T细胞受体(TCRs)和抗体识别的结构基础、通过DNA甲基化或组蛋白修饰的表观遗传调控,以及在TNBC中的表达模式或临床相关性。对12项研究、共1,545例TNBC患者进行的系统荟萃分析显示,NY-ESO-1表达的合并患病率为16.1%(95% CI:11.4-22.2%),异质性(I 2 =83.7%)可归因于用于NY-ESO-1检测的抗体克隆(E978:15.1% vs. D8.38:32.6%,p<0.0001)和评分方法(复合评分:15.9% vs. 双重评分:16.9% vs. H-score:10.1% vs. 简单阈值:32.6%,p<0.001)。结构分析揭示了TCRs、抗体和工程化结合支架对NY-ESO-1 157-165的识别。我们审查了NY-ESO-1靶向治疗的临床前和临床证据,包括过继细胞治疗和肽疫苗,这些治疗显示出可控的安全性特征并诱导免疫反应。表观遗传调控是一种治疗途径,其中去甲基化药物和组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂可上调NY-ESO-1表达,从而促进肿瘤免疫原性。尽管如此,挑战仍然存在,如NY-ESO-1表达异质性、缺乏TNBC特异性临床试验以及免疫原性不足。未来研究应标准化NY-ESO-1检测方案,以识别适合接受NY-ESO-1靶向免疫治疗的TNBC患者,并优先开展TNBC特异性试验及与表观遗传启动剂的联合方案。

展开英文摘要原文

Breast cancer remains one of the most common types of cancer, including the subtype triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) which is challenging to treat due to its aggressiveness. Cancer-testis antigens (CTAs), especially New York Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma 1 (NY-ESO-1), have become promising immunotherapeutic targets attributable to their restricted expression profile in normal tissues but overexpressed in TNBC, leading to immunogenicity. This review provides comprehensive discussion of NY-ESO-1 including its structural basis of NY-ESO-1 recognition by T cell receptors (TCRs) and antibodies, epigenetic regulation via DNA methylation or histone modifications, and expression patterns or clinical relevance in TNBC. A systematic meta-analysis of 12 studies comprising 1,545 TNBC patients showed a pooled NY-ESO-1 expression prevalence of 16.1% (95% CI: 11.4-22.2%), with heterogeneity (I 2 =83.7%) attributable to antibody clone used for NY-ESO-1 detection (E978: 15.1% vs. D8.38: 32.6%, p<0.0001) and scoring methods (composite scoring: 15.9% vs. dual scoring: 16.9% vs. H-score: 10.1% vs. simple threshold: 32.6%, p<0.001). Structural analyses reveal NY-ESO-1 157-165 recognition by TCRs, antibodies, and engineered binding scaffolds. We examine preclinical and clinical evidence for NY-ESO-1-targeted therapies, including adoptive cell therapy and peptide vaccines, which show manageable safety profiles and induce immunological responses. Epigenetic regulation is a therapeutic avenue, whereby hypomethylating agents and histone deacetylase inhibitors can upregulate NY-ESO-1 expressions that promote tumor immunogenicity. Nonetheless, challenges persist such as NY-ESO-1 expression heterogeneity, lack of TNBC-specific clinical trials, and inadequate immunogenicity. Future research should standardize NY-ESO-1 detection protocols to identify TNBC patients for NY-ESO-1-targeted immunotherapy, prioritize TNBC-specific trials and combinations with epigenetic priming agents.

论文信息

作者
Nik Amirah Auni NMA、Mohd Redzwan N、Hussain FA、Yahya MM、Ab Hamid SS、Wong KK
第一作者单位
Department of Immunology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.Malaysia
通讯作者单位
Department of Immunology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia. Electronic address: kahkeng@usm.my.Malaysia
文献类型
系统综述 · 荟萃分析
期刊
International immunopharmacology2026 May 15
原文标识
PubMed 41846058 · DOI 10.1016/j.intimp.2026.116459