研究概要
这些结果表明,MySIm-Q 基于多项证据来源产生了可靠且有效的评分,支持其作为适用于 MM 患者临床结局评估的 fit-for-purpose PRO 工具使用。
研究思路结论见上方概要
背景
多发性骨髓瘤症状与影响问卷(MySIm-Q)是一种经过验证的、疾病特异性的患者报告结局(PRO)工具,用于测量多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者所经历的症状和影响。我们使用CARTITUDE-4数据描述了MySIm-Q工具的关键测量属性。
方法
3期CARTITUDE-4(NCT04181827)试验在既往接受1–3线治疗后来那度胺难治的MM患者中,比较ciltacabtagene autoleucel与标准治疗方案。根据美国食品药品监督管理局关于临床试验中PRO测量使用的指南,评估了MySIm-Q症状和影响评分(2个独立概念)的信度,以及结构效度、聚合效度和区分效度的各个方面。
结果
共有361名患者完成了MySIm-Q评估。内部一致性结果达到预设阈值(McDonald's ꞷ系数 > 0.7;总症状评分ꞷ=0.87,总影响评分ꞷ=0.79),而重测信度略低于该阈值(组内相关系数[ICC](2,1) > 0.70;ICC分别为0.67和0.65)。通过多个假设确立了总症状评分和总影响评分的已知组效度。从验证性因子分析模型估计的因子得分与症状评分和影响评分中计算的简单观测得分高度相关。条目水平的聚合效度和区分效度分别在所有条目和几乎所有条目上得到支持。总分的领域聚合效度和区分效度基本达到要求。
展开英文摘要原文
BACKGROUND
The Multiple Myeloma Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (MySIm-Q) is a validated, disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument that measures symptoms and impacts experienced by patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We describe key measurement properties of the MySIm-Q instrument using CARTITUDE-4 data. METHODOLOGY: The phase 3 CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827) trial compares ciltacabtagene autoleucel with standard-of-care regimens in patients with lenalidomide-refractory MM after 1–3 lines of therapy. Following US Food and Drug Administration guidance on the use of PRO measures in clinical trials, the reliability, as well as aspects of construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity of the MySIm-Q symptom and impact scores (2 separate concepts) were assessed.
RESULTS
In total, 361 patients completed MySIm-Q assessments. Internal consistency results met the predefined threshold (McDonald’s ꞷ coefficient > 0.7; ꞷ=0.87 for total symptom scores, ꞷ=0.79 for total impact scores), while test-retest reliability was slightly below this threshold (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC](2,1) > 0.70; ICC = 0.67 and 0.65, respectively). Known-groups validity of total symptom and total impact scores was established through multiple hypotheses. Factor scores estimated from the confirmatory factor analysis model were highly correlated with simple observed scores calculated in symptom and impact scores. Item-level convergent and discriminant validity was supported for all and nearly all items, respectively. Domain convergent and discriminant validity for total scores were largely met.
CONCLUSIONS
These results demonstrate that the MySIm-Q yields reliable and valid scores based on a number of evidentiary sources, supporting its use as a fit-for-purpose PRO instrument in clinical outcome assessments for patients with MM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CARTITUDE-4: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04181827. Date of registration: 27 November 2019. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04181827 .
论文信息
- 作者
- Mina R、Mylin AK、Yokoyama H、Magen H、Alsdorf W、Shune L、Isufi I、Harrison SJ
- 单位
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Rd N E, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. rmina2@emory.edu.United States
- 文献类型
- III 期临床试验 · 验证性研究
- 期刊
- Journal of patient-reported outcomes2026 Mar 13