CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Peripheral blood inflammatory ratios predict efficacy and toxicity of CAR-T cell immunotherapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Peripheral blood inflammatory ratios predict efficacy and toxicity of CAR-T cell immunotherapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
基线外周血炎症比值与接受 CAR-T 治疗的 R/R MM 患者的 CAR-T 细胞疗效和 CRS 严重程度密切相关。CIPI 评分是一种简单且可重复的预后生物标志物,可能有助于 CAR-T 治疗中的个体化风险分层并指导治疗优化。
尽管CAR-T 细胞疗法在复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(R/R MM)中疗效显著,但治疗反应和毒性表现出相当大的异质性。本研究旨在评估基线外周血炎症比值——即中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)——在接受CAR-T 治疗的R/R MM患者中的预后意义,并基于这些参数开发一个综合预后指数。
我们开展了一项回顾性分析,纳入197例接受CAR-T 治疗的R/R MM患者。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定NLR、MLR和PLR的最佳截断值。评估了这些比值与治疗效果、CAR转基因扩增、细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和无进展生存期(PFS)之间的关联。开发了一个整合NLR、MLR和PLR的复合细胞炎症预后指数(CIPI),用于评估预后分层。
NLR、MLR和PLR的最佳截断值分别为2.55、0.35和145。基线炎症比值低的患者表现出显著更高的CAR转基因扩增,并且与基线炎症比值高的患者相比,与更好的治疗反应相关。低NLR组显示出更优的客观缓解率(93.8% vs. 81.2%,p = 0.037),且与高NLR组相比,低NLR组观察到更长的中位PFS(18.6 vs. 10.9个月,p = 0.0012)。升高的炎症比值与IL-6和铁蛋白的高峰值水平以及严重CRS(≥3级)发生率的增加相关。CIPI评分有效地将患者分为低危、中危和高危组,各组PFS具有显著差异(中位PFS分别为:18.9、13.8和5.1个月;p < 0.0001)。多因素分析证实,CIPI评分是PFS的独立预后因素,高肿瘤负荷亦是如此。
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 197 R/R MM patients who received CAR-T therapy. The optimal cut-off values for NLR, MLR, and PLR were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Associations between these ratios and treatment efficacy, CAR transgene expansion, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. A composite Cellular Inflammatory Prognostic Index (CIPI) integrating NLR, MLR, and PLR was developed to assess prognostic stratification.
Optimal cut-offs for NLR, MLR, and PLR were 2.55, 0.35, and 145, respectively. Patients with low baseline inflammatory ratios exhibited significantly higher CAR transgene expansion and were associated with better treatment responses than that of patients with high baseline inflammatory ratios. The low NLR group showed a superior objective response rate (93.8% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.037) and a longer median PFS was observed in the low NLR group compared with the high NLR group (18.6 vs. 10.9 months, p = 0.0012). Elevated inflammatory ratios correlated with high peak levels of IL-6 and ferritin and an increased incidence of severe CRS ( grade 3). The CIPI score effectively stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with distinct PFS (median PFS: 18.9, 13.8, and 5.1 months, respectively; p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the CIPI score was an independent prognostic factor for PFS, along with high tumor burden.
Baseline peripheral blood inflammatory ratios are closely associated with CAR-T cell efficacy and CRS severity in R/R MM patients receiving CAR-T therapy. The CIPI score represents a simple and reproducible prognostic biomarker that may help individualized risk stratification and inform treatment optimization in CAR-T therapy.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
READING GUIDES
了解这条资料涉及的技术、疾病或试验登记信息,再回到原始来源核实。
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。