CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Toxicities associated with CAR-T therapy compared with standard treatments in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Toxicities associated with CAR-T therapy compared with standard treatments in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CAR-T 治疗导致一种独特的、时间集中的毒性表型,而非相比其他高强度治疗统一更高的毒性负担。尽管免疫介导的毒性是 CAR-T 治疗的特征,但血液学和感染风险与其他先进治疗方式,尤其是 allo-HSCT,显著重叠。该研究强调,在高治疗需求环境中以及在配备标准化毒性管理策略的完善中心提供 CAR-T 治疗的迫切必要性,这与平衡的、个体化的治疗选择相一致。
CAR-T 细胞治疗已经彻底改变了复发/难治性血液系统恶性肿瘤的治疗方法。但其独特的毒性特征,尤其是免疫介导的不良事件,与其他高强度治疗策略相比是一个重要问题。系统、比较性、针对性地评估CAR-T 相关毒性对于指导临床实践和机构准备至关重要。
我们进行了一项系统综述和meta分析,比较CAR-T 疗法与标准治疗方法(包括基于常规化疗的方案、强化单克隆抗体疗法和异基因造血干细胞移植(allo HSCT))相关显著毒性的发生率和管理。主要结局为细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)、免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)、持续性血细胞减少、严重感染和治疗相关死亡率(TRM)。使用随机效应模型进行随机效应分析。预设亚组分析按对照类型进行,并进行排除CRS和ICANS的敏感性分析、时间毒性分析和临床异质性评估。
CAR-T 治疗与严重 CRS 和 ICANS 风险显著升高相关(相对风险 [RR] > 8),相较于常规化疗,并且这些风险可能在基线时即存在机制上的差异,提示其潜在机制存在根本不同。当与强化单克隆抗体治疗和 allo-HSCT 比较时,这些风险有所降低,但仍具有显著性。与之形成鲜明对比的是,持续性血细胞减少和严重感染的差异较为温和,且取决于对照选择。在仅限于血液学和感染性毒性的敏感性分析中,CAR-T 治疗仍与持续性血细胞减少风险增加(RR 3.10;95% CI,2.43-3.95)和严重感染风险增加(RR 2.00;95% CI,1.53-2.62)相关,进一步强化了这些发现超越免疫介导事件的稳健性。TRM 与大多数比较无显著差异。时间分析显示,毒性呈双相关系,早期为免疫介导事件,中期/晚期为血液学和感染性事件。观察到的异质性归因于 CAR-T 构建体、疾病负荷、既往治疗暴露和机构管理实践。
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) treatment has revolutionized the therapeutic approach for relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. But its unique toxicity profile, particularly immune-mediated adverse events, is a significant question in comparison with other high-intensity therapy strategies. Systematic, comparative, specific assessment of CAR-T associated toxicities are essential to guide clinical practice and institutional preparedness.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the incidence and management of significant toxicities associated with CAR T therapy versus standard treatment approaches, including conventional chemotherapy based regimens, intensive monoclonal antibody based therapies, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo HSCT). The primary outcomes looked for were cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), prolonged cytopenias, serious infections, and treatment-related mortality (TRM). Random-effects analysis was performed using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were planned according to comparator type, sensitivity analyses excluding CRS and ICANS, temporal toxicity analyses, and clinical heterogeneity assessments.
CAR-T therapy was associated with significantly elevated risks of severe CRS and ICANS (relative risks [RRs] > 8) in relation to conventional chemotherapy, and that they might be mechanistically at baseline, suggesting fundamental differences in the underlying mechanism. These risks were reduced, though they stayed significant, when compared with the intensive monoclonal antibody based therapies and allo-HSCT. In stark contrast, differences in prolonged cytopenia and serious infections were more modest and comparator dependent. In sensitivity analyses limited to hematologic and infectious toxicities, CAR-T therapy remained associated with increased risk of prolonged cytopenias (RR 3.10; 95% CI, 2.43 3.95) and serious infections (RR 2.00; 95% CI, 1.53 2.62), reinforcing the robustness of the findings beyond immune-mediated events. TRM was not significantly different from most comparisons. Temporal analyses showed a biphasic relationship of toxicity with early immune-mediated and intermediate/late hematologic and infectious events. The observed heterogeneity was attributed to the CAR-T construct, disease burden, prior treatment exposure, and institutional management practices.
CAR-T therapy results in a unique, temporally concentrated toxicity phenotype as opposed to a uniformly higher toxicity burden than alternative high-intensity therapies. Although immune-mediated toxicities differentiate CAR-T therapy, hematologic and infectious risks overlap significantly with those of other advanced modalities, particularly allo-HSCT. The study emphasizes the imperative need for CAR-T therapy delivered in high-therapeutic-demand settings and in well-equipped centers with standardized toxicity management strategies, consistent with balanced, individualized treatment selection.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。