CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:The Berlin-Hannover ICANS severity assessment-a novel bedside test to evaluate CAR T-cell-associated neurotoxicity.
The Berlin-Hannover ICANS severity assessment-a novel bedside test to evaluate CAR T-cell-associated neurotoxicity.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
BHISA 通过纳入额外的认知和运动领域,可能比 ICE 提供更敏感、区分度更高的 ICANS 筛查工具,同时仍易于使用。
**背景:**嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法已改变难治性血液系统恶性肿瘤的治疗,但常并发免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)。早期临床识别仍具挑战,因为常用的免疫效应细胞相关脑病(ICE)评分对细微缺损不够敏感。**方法:**本项前瞻性双中心研究纳入在汉诺威医学院和柏林夏里特医学院接受CAR-T 治疗的100例患者,采用ICE和新开发的柏林—汉诺威ICANS严重度评估(BHISA)进行系统神经学评估。评估时间包括CAR-T 输注前基线、输注后第6–7天(±1天)及ICANS发作期间,并收集临床病程、其他毒性、合并症、CAR-T 产品及ICANS治疗数据。**结果:**37例患者(37%)发生ICANS,其发生与此前出现细胞因子释放综合征及特定CAR-T 产品相关。
ICE评分在基线和随访时常集中于最高分,而BHISA评分分布更广,对细微变化更敏感。相关分析证实ICE与BHISA结果一致,但BHISA更可靠地捕捉早期认知下降。受试者工作特征分析显示,两者诊断准确度相近(BHISA:AUC=0.783;ICE:AUC=0.777),但在相同特异度下BHISA敏感度始终较高。(特异度目标为0.7时,BHISA敏感度0.743,ICE为0.571;特异度目标为0.8时,BHISA敏感度0.629,ICE为0.571。)**结论:**BHISA纳入更多认知和运动维度,同时保持易于使用,可能比ICE更敏感、区分度更高,可用于ICANS筛查。这可能有助于更早、更细致地识别CAR-T 相关神经毒性,并改善异质性患者群体的监测。
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of refractory hematological malignancies but is frequently complicated by immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Early clinical recognition remains challenging, as the commonly used Immune Effector Cell-Associated Encephalopathy (ICE) score lacks sensitivity for subtle deficits.
In this prospective bicentric study, 100 patients treated with CAR T-cells at Hannover Medical School and Charit - Universit tsmedizin Berlin underwent systematic neurological assessments using both ICE and the newly developed Berlin-Hannover ICANS Severity Assessment (BHISA). Examinations were performed at baseline prior to CAR T-cell infusion, on day 6-7 ( 1 day) post-infusion, and during ICANS episodes. Data on the clinical course, other toxicities, comorbidities, CAR T-cell products, and ICANS treatment were collected.
Thirty-seven patients (37%) developed ICANS, which was associated with preceding cytokine release syndrome and specific CAR T-cell products. While ICE scores clustered at maximum values both at baseline and follow-up, BHISA showed a broader distribution and higher sensitivity to subtle changes. Correlation analyses confirmed agreement between ICE and BHISA, but BHISA captured early cognitive decline more reliably. Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated comparable diagnostic accuracy (BHISA: AUC = 0.783, ICE: AUC = 0,777), with consistently higher sensitivity of BHISA at matched specificity. (Specificity target = 0.7, BHISA sensitivity = 0.743, ICE sensitivity = 0.571; Specificity target = 0.8, BHISA sensitivity = 0.629, ICE sensitivity = 0.571).
BHISA may provide a more sensitive and more differentiated screening tool for ICANS than ICE by incorporating additional cognitive and motor domains, while remaining easy to use. This may enable earlier and more nuanced detection of CAR T related neurotoxicity, potentially improving patient monitoring across a heterogeneous population.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。