CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Salvage Therapies After Anti-BCMA CAR-T Failure in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates.
Salvage Therapies After Anti-BCMA CAR-T Failure in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
尽管靶向B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)的嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞显著推动了多发性骨髓瘤(MM)治疗,但许多患者最终仍会进展,因此亟需寻找最有效的挽救方案。为此,我们开展随机效应荟萃分析,评估抗BCMA CAR-T 治疗失败后的挽救治疗缓解率。通过系统数据库筛查,确定36项符合条件的研究,共476例患者和7种不同干预方案。其中双特异性抗体(bsAb)最常使用,其次为抗BCMA CAR-T 细胞。
我们分别评估一线挽救治疗及任何后续挽救治疗(合并)的缓解率。一线治疗中,selinexor方案总缓解率(ORR)最高,为67%(95% CI 38%–91%),其次为bsAb(60%;95% CI 43%–76%)。合并分析中,抗GPRC5D CAR-T 细胞ORR最高(88%;95% CI 65%–100%),其次为抗BCMA CAR-T 细胞(75%;95% CI 42%–98%)。Belantamab mafodotin疗效最低(0%;95% CI 0%–17%)。所有干预的完全缓解率均较低(范围0%–40%)。异质性分析显示,人源/人源化抗BCMA CAR-T 构建体的应答优于动物源受体。
总之,本荟萃分析提示,CAR-T 细胞和bsAb适合用于抗BCMA CAR-T 治疗失败后的MM挽救治疗。试验注册:PROSPERO编号CRD42024621077。
Although chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) have significantly advanced multiple myeloma (MM) therapy, many patients eventually progress, prompting the search for the most effective salvage regimens. To address this demand, we performed a random-effects meta-analysis evaluating response rates to salvage treatments after anti-BCMA CAR-T failure.
We identified 36 eligible studies comprising 476 patients and seven distinct interventions through systematic database screening. Among them, bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) were the most common choice, followed by anti-BCMA CAR-T cells.
We separately assessed response rates to both first- and any subsequent (combined)-line salvage interventions. In the first-line setting, selinexor-based regimens yielded the highest overall response rates (ORR) of 67% (95% CI: 38%-91%), followed by bsAbs (60%; 95% CI: 43%-76%). In the combined setting, anti-GPRC5D CAR-T cells achieved the highest ORR (88%; 95% CI: 65%-100%), followed by anti-BCMA CAR-T cells (75%; 95% CI: 42%-98%).
Belantamab mafodotin demonstrated the lowest efficacy (0%; 95% CI: 0%-17%). Complete response rates remained low across all interventions (range: 0%-40%). Heterogeneity investigations revealed superior responses with human/humanized anti-BCMA CAR-T constructs compared with the animal-based receptors. In summary, our meta-analysis suggested that CAR-T cells and bsAbs are suitable for salvage use after anti-BCMA CAR-T failure in MM. Trial Registration: PROSPERO number: CRD42024621077.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。