← 返回

CAR-T 与纳米载体肿瘤疗法的通用逻辑门控框架:逻辑架构及其分子实现策略的跨平台比较分析

英文原题:A general logic-gating framework for CAR-T and nanocarrier cancer therapies: A cross-platform comparative analysis of logic architectures and their molecular implementation strategies.

查看英文原题

A general logic-gating framework for CAR-T and nanocarrier cancer therapies: A cross-platform comparative analysis of logic architectures and their molecular implementation strategies.

PubMed 2025/12/30(内容时间) J Control Release Q1 · IF 12.4(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

逻辑门控靶向治疗是提高癌症治疗特异性的新兴策略,通过整合多个生物学输入来控制治疗激活。受数字电子学启发,这类系统采用AND、OR和NOT等布尔逻辑运算,根据抗原共表达、酸性或氧化应激等肿瘤相关信号的组合,将治疗活性限制在特定细胞或微环境背景中。本综述提出一个通用逻辑门控框架,统一两类主要治疗模式的术语、设计原则和机制特征:CAR-T 细胞利用抗原来源的输入信号实现蛋白质层面的逻辑运算;纳米载体则针对肿瘤微环境信号通过化学方式编码逻辑。该框架形式化了关键设计维度,包括逻辑架构、分子实现、逻辑行为以及门控发生于治疗机制的哪个阶段。这些维度共同构成跨平台描述、比较和设计逻辑门控疗法的通用语言。将逻辑行为视作独立设计维度,可揭示治疗系统如何把输入信号强度转化为激活输出。在该框架中,逻辑行为既包括定性特征(如数字式的陡峭激活与模拟式的渐进激活),也包括激活应答的定量方面,包括阈值表现及激活随时间动态展开的方式。不同治疗模式的逻辑行为差异,源自输入信号性质以及控制信号传递和放大的分子实现方式。如此形式化逻辑行为,可在逻辑架构和结构特征之外系统比较各类门控系统,并解释跨平台的行为差异。

总体而言,本研究将分子逻辑门控和多标志物靶向纳入统一概念体系,厘清不同平台的现有限制及差异,并提出开发特异性更高、靶向肿瘤同时损伤正常组织毒性更低的下一代可编程癌症疗法的机会。

展开英文摘要原文

Logic-gated targeted therapies represent an emerging strategy to enhance specificity in cancer treatment by integrating multiple biological inputs to control therapeutic activation. Inspired by digital electronics, these systems apply Boolean logic operations such as AND, OR, and NOT to restrict therapeutic activity within defined cellular or microenvironmental contexts, based on combinations of tumor-associated cues such as antigen co-expression, acidity, or oxidative stress.

This review develops a generalized logic-gating framework that unifies terminology, design principles, and mechanistic features across two major therapeutic modalities: CAR-T cells, which implement protein-based logic using antigen-derived input signals, and nanocarriers, which encode logic chemically in response to tumor microenvironmental cues. The framework formalizes key design dimensions, including logic architecture, molecular implementation, logic behavior, and the stage within the therapeutic mechanism at which gating occurs.

Together, these dimensions provide a shared vocabulary for describing, comparing, and designing logic-gated therapies across platforms. Considering logic behavior as a distinct design dimension reveals how logic-gated therapeutic systems translate input signal intensity into activation output. Within the proposed framework, logic behavior captures both qualitative features, such as sharp (digital-like) versus graded (analog-like) activation, and quantitative aspects of the activation response, including threshold behavior and how activation dynamically unfolds over time.

Differences in logic behavior across therapeutic modalities arise from the nature of the input signals and from the molecular implementations that govern signal propagation and amplification. Formalizing logic behavior in this way provides a basis for systematic comparison of logic-gated systems beyond logic architecture and structural features alone and for interpreting differences in system behavior across platforms.

Overall, this work positions molecular logic gating and multimarker targeting within a unified conceptual structure, clarifies current limitations and variability across platforms, and outlines opportunities for designing next-generation programmable cancer therapies with improved specificity and reduced on-target, off-tumor toxicity.

论文信息

作者
Rehorst P、Kros A
第一作者单位
Supramolecular and Biomaterials Chemistry, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, the Netherlands.Netherlands
通讯作者单位
Supramolecular and Biomaterials Chemistry, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: a.kros@chem.leidenuniv.nl.Netherlands
文献类型
综述 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2026 Mar 10
原文标识
PubMed 41478377 · DOI 10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114583