← 返回

移植后复发 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病患者中受者来源 vs. 供者来源 CAR-T 细胞治疗:一项多中心回顾性研究

英文原题:Recipient-derived vs. donor-derived CAR-T-cell therapy in relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients after transplantation: A multi-center retrospective study.

查看英文原题

Recipient-derived vs. donor-derived CAR-T-cell therapy in relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients after transplantation: A multi-center retrospective study.

PubMed 2025/12/12(内容时间) Chin Med J (Engl) Q1 · IF 9.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

受者来源与供者来源的 CD19 CAR-T 细胞疗法均为 allo-HSCT 后复发 B-ALL 患者的有效治疗选择。

中文摘要

**背景:**CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞已被证明可有效治疗异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后复发的 B 急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)。CAR-T 所需 T 细胞可来自患者(受者)或供者的外周血。尽管两种来源细胞的基因组相同,其成熟所处环境不同,可能导致功能差异。

本研究旨在比较这两种来源 CAR-T 细胞的临床结局。**方法:**这项多中心回顾性队列研究收集了 2016 年 1 月至 2023 年 10 月期间,来自 7 个中心的 36 例 allo-HSCT 后 B-ALL 复发并接受 CD19 CAR-T 治疗患者的临床资料。主要终点为 CAR-T 输注后第 28 天完全缓解(CR)/血液学恢复不完全的 CR(CRi)率。次要终点包括 2 年总生存期(OS)率、2 年无事件生存期(EFS)率、移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)、细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)及 CAR-T 相关脑病综合征(CRES)发生率。**结果:**回顾性分析的 36 例患者中,受者来源组 12 例、供者来源组 24 例。两组的 CR/CRi 率(83.3% 对 100.0%,P=0.105)、2 年 EFS 率(50.8% 对 51.6%,P=0.617)或 2 年 OS 率(49.5% 对 63.6%,P=0.215)均无统计学显著差异。两组 GVHD、CRS 和 CRES 发生率也无显著差异。

进一步分析供者组时,其中包括 12 例同胞全相合供者(MSD)和 12 例单倍体供者(HID)。HID 组 2 年 EFS 率显著高于 MSD 组(75.0% 对 30.7%,P=0.043),而两亚组的 CR/CRi 率、2 年 OS 及 GVHD、CRS 和 CRES 发生率均无显著差异。**结论:**受者来源和供者来源 CD19 CAR-T 疗法均可有效治疗 allo-HSCT 后复发的 B-ALL。HID 来源 CAR-T 细胞带来更长 EFS,可能是优选方案。**试验注册:**中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR2400085297。

展开英文摘要原文

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells have been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). T cells for CAR-T therapy can be derived from the peripheral blood (recipient) of the patient or donor. Despite having identical genomes, the different maturation environments of these T cells can lead to functional differences. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of CAR-T cells derived from these two sources.

This multicenter, retrospective cohort study collected clinical data from 36 patients who experienced B-ALL relapse after allo-HSCT and received CD19 CAR-T cell therapy between January 2016 and October 2023 across seven centers. The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR)/CR with an incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate at 28 days post-CAR-T cell infusion. Secondary endpoints included the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate, 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rate, incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and CAR-T cell-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES).

A retrospective analysis was performed on 36 patients: 12 in the recipient group and 24 in the donor group. The recipient and donor groups showed no statistically significant differences in CR/CRi rates (83.3% vs. 100.0%, P = 0.105), 2-year EFS rates (50.8% vs. 51.6%, P = 0.617), or 2-year OS rates (49.5% vs. 63.6%, P = 0.215). In addition, the incidences of GVHD, CRS, and CRES did not significantly differ between the two groups. Further analysis within the donor group revealed 12 matched sibling donors (MSDs) and 12 haploidentical donors (HIDs). The 2-year EFS rate was statistically significantly greater in the HID group than in the MSD group (75.0% vs. 30.7%, P = 0.043), whereas no significant differences were observed in the CR/CRi rates, 2-year OS, or the incidence of GVHD, CRS, and CRES between these subgroups.

Both recipient-derived and donor-derived CD19 CAR-T cell therapies are effective treatment options for B-ALL relapsed post-allo-HSCT patients. HID-derived CAR-T cells offer a longer EFS and may be considered the optimal choice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, No. ChiCTR2400085297.

论文信息

作者
Liu L、Hu Y、Huang R、Li Y、Tu S、Chen S、Yi H、Gao Q
单位
Medical Center of Hematology, Institute of Science Innovation for Blood Ecology and Intelligent Cells, Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.China
文献类型
多中心研究 · 观察性研究
期刊
Chinese medical journal2026 Aug 20
原文标识
PubMed 41384350 · DOI 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003855