CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Posttransplant cells for the win? DLI and adoptive cell therapy to eradicate MRD.
Posttransplant cells for the win? DLI and adoptive cell therapy to eradicate MRD.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
复发仍然是血液系统恶性肿瘤接受异基因干细胞移植(allo-SCT)后治疗失败的首要原因。供者淋巴细胞输注(DLI),即输注来自原始干细胞供者的淋巴细胞,于20世纪80年代末被引入,作为一种通过增强移植物抗白血病(GvL)效应来预防或治疗复发的策略。随着时间的推移,DLI已被用于多种场景:最初作为治疗性DLI用于明显复发,后来作为抢先性DLI,针对复发的早期迹象(如持续或复发的可测量残留病(MRD))进行给药,或作为预防性DLI以在临床复发发生前降低高复发风险(见视觉摘要)。
然而,关于如何、何时以及对谁最佳部署DLI仍存在疑问,反映了临床实践中持续存在的争议和异质性。最近一项对43个国家165个欧洲血液与骨髓移植学会中心的调查报告称,43.8%的中心将DLI预防性用于高危血液系统疾病。86.9%的中心将DLI抢先性用于MRD阳性,73.1%用于混合嵌合状态。73.1%的中心将治疗性DLI用于血液学复发。85.6%和57.5%的中心分别将活动性移植物抗宿主病和活动性感染视为绝对禁忌证。观察到的中心实践差异凸显了阐明移植后细胞干预“对谁、何时以及为何”的必要性。在这篇综述中,我们探讨DLI策略及其与新型靶向治疗在预防性、抢先性和治疗性应用中的潜在序贯方案,并通过急性髓系白血病患者的病例示例进行说明。
我们重点介绍了回顾性研究以及为数不多的前瞻性研究的发现,并将讨论扩展至其他适应症,包括慢性髓性白血病、骨髓纤维化和急性淋巴细胞白血病。
此外,我们还综述了针对不同血液系统恶性肿瘤的靶向治疗新兴联合策略,以及超越传统 DLI 的过继细胞疗法。
Relapse remains the leading cause of failure after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) for hematologic malignancies. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), the infusion of lymphocytes from the original stem cell donor, was introduced in the late 1980s as a strategy to prevent or treat relapse by augmenting the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect.
Over time, DLI has been used in various settings: initially as therapeutic DLI for overt relapse and later as preemptive DLI, administered in response to early signs of relapse, such as persistent or recurrent measurable residual disease (MRD), or as prophylactic DLI to mitigate high relapse risk before clinical relapse occurs (see Visual Abstract).
However, questions remain regarding how, when, and in whom DLI is best deployed, reflecting ongoing controversy and heterogeneity in clinical practice. A recent survey of 165 European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centers across 43 countries reported that DLI was used prophylactically for high-risk hematologic diseases in 43. 8% of these centers. DLI was used preemptively for MRD positivity in 86. 9% of centers and for mixed chimerism in 73. 1%. Therapeutic DLI was administered for hematologic relapse in 73. 1% of centers.
Active graft-versus-host disease and active infections were considered absolute contraindications by 85. 6% and 57. 5% of the centers, respectively. This observed variability in center practices underscores the need to clarify the "who, when, and why" of posttransplant cellular interventions. In this review, we explore DLI strategies and the potential sequencing with novel targeted therapies across prophylactic, preemptive, and therapeutic applications, illustrated through case examples in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
We highlight findings from retrospective, as well as the scarce prospective studies and extend considerations to other indications, including chronic myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Additionally, we review emerging combination strategies with targeted therapies across different hematologic malignancies and adoptive cell therapies beyond conventional DLI.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。