← 返回

肿瘤患者入住重症监护病房改变预后的时机与人群——一项范围综述

英文原题:When and for Whom Does Intensive Care Unit Admission Change the Prognosis in Oncology?-A Scoping Review.

查看英文原题

When and for Whom Does Intensive Care Unit Admission Change the Prognosis in Oncology?-A Scoping Review.

PubMed 2025/11/12(内容时间) Cancers (Basel) Q2 · IF 4.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

肿瘤学与重症监护的交汇点已从以临终关怀为主转变为治疗桥梁,在精心筛选的患者中可维持抗癌治疗轨迹。然而,区分获益与无效的标准仍然零散。

本文旨在梳理关于成人癌症患者入住 Intensive Care Unit (ICU) 后结局的当代证据(2015-2025),并识别 ICU 级别治疗仍能改变预后的临床情境。

采用 PRISMA-ScR 范围综述(PCC 框架)。PubMed 检索(2015-2025),双人筛选,标准化提取;采用叙述性/主题性综合,涵盖六个集群(血液系统恶性肿瘤、实体瘤、脓毒症/非 COVID-19 感染、COVID-19/病毒性肺炎、新型/靶向治疗毒性、终末期/激进 ICU)。鉴于异质性,未进行 meta 分析。

共纳入 73 项研究(>170,000 例 ICU 入住),多为队列设计,覆盖 27 个国家。ICU 死亡率范围为 8-72%(加权均值 41%);住院死亡率 38%;90 天死亡率 46%;1 年死亡率 62%。约三分之一的 ICU 存活者恢复了全身治疗。获益集中于早期入住、单器官衰竭、疾病控制/缓解、术后/择期监测以及可逆的治疗相关毒性(如 ICI 肺炎、CAR-T CRS/ICANS)。无效集中于 3 种器官支持、RRT > 7 天、难治性/进展性疾病以及 ECOG 3。脓毒症结局平均 ICU 死亡率为 45-55%,但通过快速识别和感染源控制有所改善;COVID-19 死亡率在大流行早期于血液系统恶性肿瘤中尤其高,疫苗接种后随后下降。

在现代肿瘤实践中,当急性生理损伤可逆且肿瘤控制仍可行时,ICU治疗可改变预后;相反,高器官支持负担和难治性疾病则界定了实际无效的阈值。这些信号支持限时ICU试验、对脓毒症/irAEs更早介入ICU,以及嵌入姑息治疗以使治疗强度与目标相一致。

展开英文摘要原文

Background: The intersection between oncology and intensive care has shifted from predominantly end-of-life care to a therapeutic bridge that can preserve anticancer trajectories in carefully selected patients. Yet, criteria separating benefit from futility remain fragmented. Objective: This paper seeks to map contemporary evidence (2015-2025) on outcomes after Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission in adults with cancer and to identify clinical constellations in which ICU-level care still changes prognosis. Methods: PRISMA-ScR scoping review (PCC framework). PubMed search (2015-2025), dual screening, standardized extraction; narrative/thematic synthesis across six clusters (hematologic, solid tumors, sepsis/non-COVID-19 infection, COVID-19/viral pneumonia, novel/targeted-therapy toxicities, end-of-life/aggressive ICU) were used. No meta-analysis given heterogeneity. Results: Seventy-three studies (>170,000 ICU admissions) were included, mostly cohort designs across 27 countries. ICU mortality ranged 8-72% (weighted mean 41%); hospital 38%; 90-day 46%; 1-year 62%.

About one third of ICU survivors resumed systemic therapy. Benefit concentrated in early admissions, single-organ failure, controlled/remission disease, postoperative/elective monitoring, and reversible treatment-related toxicities (e. g. , ICI pneumonitis, CAR-T CRS/ICANS). Futility clustered around 3 organ supports, RRT > 7 days, refractory/progressive disease, and ECOG 3. Sepsis outcomes averaged 45-55% ICU mortality but improved with rapid recognition and source control; COVID-19 mortality was particularly high in hematologic malignancies early in the pandemic, with subsequent declines post-vaccination.

Conclusions: In modern oncologic practice, ICU care changes prognosis when the acute physiological insult is reversible and cancer control remains plausible; conversely, high organ-support burden and refractory disease define practical futility thresholds. These signals support time-limited ICU trials, earlier ICU involvement for sepsis/irAEs, and embedded palliative care to align intensity with goals.

论文信息

作者
Codru IR、Vecerzan L
单位
Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania.Italy
文献类型
综述
期刊
Cancers2025 Nov 12
原文标识
PubMed 41301003 · DOI 10.3390/cancers17223636