CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Preliminary evaluation of a whole blood dual-platform flow cytometry protocol for CAR-T cell quantitation: Toward accreditation and clinical routine application.
Preliminary evaluation of a whole blood dual-platform flow cytometry protocol for CAR-T cell quantitation: Toward accreditation and clinical routine application.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CAR-T 细胞是癌症细胞疗法领域的重要科学突破,改变了血液系统疾病的治疗。药代动力学研究凸显了监测外周血CAR-T 细胞对预测治疗结局和管理副作用的重要性。
本研究旨在建立并评估一种适用于医院常规工作的双平台CAR-T 流式细胞定量方案,并在三种流式细胞仪(DxFLEX、Navios和Navios EX)上进行性能验证。新鲜全血采用生物素化CD19或BCMA重组蛋白及PE偶联抗生物素抗体染色。去除双联体后,在CD45+CD3+细胞中识别CAR-T 细胞,并使用对照管确定T淋巴细胞中CAR-T 阳性表达阈值。结果以CAR-T 细胞占CD3+ T淋巴细胞的百分比表示。Optilyse C和Versalyse红细胞裂解试剂测得的CAR-T 细胞比例相近;使用0.5 L CAR检测试剂与厂家推荐的2 L用量相比,结果也相当。采用该方案,未观察到CD19和BCMA CAR检测试剂之间的交叉反应;即使循环CAR-T 细胞超过3000个/μL,信号也未降低。无论使用何种流式细胞仪、CAR检测试剂类型或循环CAR-T 细胞比例,重复性和中间精密度的变异系数均始终低于10%。三种流式细胞仪所得结果相关且相当。关于全血样本及染色细胞的保存时间,若采样后超过1天才进行染色,或染色细胞在4°C保存超过3天,CAR-T 细胞百分比会显著下降。
总之,我们提出了一种双平台CAR-T 细胞计数方案,可稳定可靠地定量BCMA和CD19 CAR-T 细胞。
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cells, commonly known as CAR-T cells, have represented a major scientific breakthrough in cancer cell therapy revolutionizing the treatment of haematological disorders. Pharmacokinetic studies highlighted the importance of peripheral blood CAR-T cell monitoring to predict therapeutic outcomes and manage side effects.
This study aimed to establish and evaluate on three different flow cytometers (DxFLEX, Navios and Navios EX) the performances of a dual-platform protocol for CAR-T quantitation method using flow cytometry in a context of hospital routine use. Fresh whole blood was stained using a biotinylated CD19 or BCMA recombinant protein and a PE-coupled anti-biotin antibody. CAR-T cells were identified among CD45+ CD3+ cells after doublets elimination, using a control tube to define CAR-T positive expression threshold among T lymphocytes. Results were expressed as percentages of CAR T cells among CD3+ T lymphocytes.
Optilyse C and Versalyse red blood cell lysis reagents (Beckman Coulter) gave comparable results in terms of CAR T cell percentage among T lymphocytes as well as using 0. 5 L CAR detection reagent compared to the 2 L recommended by the manufacturer. Using this protocol, we did not observe any cross-reactivity between CD19 and BCMA CAR detection reagents or decreased signal even up to >3000 circulating CAR-T cells/ L.
The coefficient of variations for repeatability and intermediate precision were systematically below 10 % whatever the flow cytometer, the type of CAR reagent detection used and the proportion of circulating CAR-T cells. All three flow cytometers returned correlated and comparable results.
Finally, concerning whole blood sample and stained cell storage duration, we observed a significant decreased of CAR-T percentages when staining was delayed for more than one day after sampling, and after three days of stained cells storage at 4 C.
In conclusion, we propose a dual-platform protocol for CAR-T cell enumeration which demonstrated consistent and reliable performances for BCMA and CD19 CAR-T cell quantification.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。