大麻二酚 (CBD) 在肺癌治疗中的潜在作用：临床前和临床证据的系统综述

Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent and lethal cancers worldwide, with limited therapeutic options in advanced stages. Cannabinoids have recently attracted attention as potential anticancer agents; however, cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive compound derived from Cannabis sativa, has emerged as the most promising candidate. Unlike 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), CBD lacks psychoactive properties, is generally well tolerated, and demonstrates a favorable safety profile. Moreover, CBD influences multiple cancer-relevant pathways-including apoptosis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and immune modulation-that are particularly relevant to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These features provide a strong rationale for focusing on CBD in lung cancer therapy.

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, using defined keywords such as "CBD," "lung cancer," and "non-small cell lung cancer." Studies from 2007 to 2025 were screened following PRISMA guidelines, and 19 studies met the inclusion criteria.

Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 13 in vitro studies, 4 in vivo animal studies, and 2 clinical reports. Across these studies, CBD was administered at concentrations ranging from low micromolar levels (1-10 M) in cell-based experiments to oral doses of 200-600 mg/day in human cases. Mechanistically, CBD induced apoptosis through pathways such as PPAR- activation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress. It inhibited epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), downregulated invasive markers, and modulated the tumor microenvironment by enhancing CD8 + T cell and NK cell activity. Furthermore, CBD showed synergistic effects with conventional therapies (e.g., cisplatin, radiotherapy) by increasing drug uptake and overcoming resistance.

CBD holds promise as an adjunct in lung cancer therapy, addressing key cancer hallmarks such as tumor growth, metastasis, and treatment resistance. While preclinical evidence is robust, clinical trials remain limited. Future research should focus on optimizing dosing regimens, evaluating long-term safety, and validating these findings in large-scale human studies.