← 返回

靶向癌症免疫治疗中的腺苷能轴:对 A(2A) 和 A(2B) 受体及新型临床联合策略的见解

英文原题:Targeting the adenosinergic axis in cancer immunotherapy: Insights into A(2A) and A(2B) receptors and novel clinical combination strategies.

查看英文原题

Targeting the adenosinergic axis in cancer immunotherapy: Insights into A(2A) and A(2B) receptors and novel clinical combination strategies.

PubMed 2025/09/19(内容时间) Pharmacol Rev Q1 · IF 20.3(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

腺苷在细胞外的蓄积是肿瘤微环境中免疫逃逸的核心机制。缺氧、慢性炎症以及外核苷酸酶活性上调所驱动的腺苷水平升高,主要通过外核苷三磷酸二磷酸水解酶1和外核苷-5'-核苷酸酶,诱导深度免疫抑制并促进肿瘤进展。

在此背景下,腺苷主要作用于2种G蛋白偶联受体,即腺苷A 2A受体(A 2A AR)和腺苷A 2B受体(A 2B AR),它们调节多种免疫细胞和基质细胞群体。A 2A AR信号传导抑制细胞毒性T淋巴细胞和NK 细胞的效应活性,而A 2B AR激活则通过放大髓源性免疫抑制、驱动基质重塑以及促进血管生成和转移播散而发挥更广泛的作用。本综述全面概述了A 2A AR和A 2B AR在免疫、基质和肿瘤区室中的不同作用及汇聚作用。

我们批判性分析了当前开发选择性及双重A 2A AR/A 2B AR拮抗剂的策略,重点关注构效关系、骨架优化和药代动力学特征。

此外,我们还审视了正在进行的临床试验以及新兴的联合治疗,这些治疗将A 2A AR和A 2B AR拮抗剂与免疫检查点抑制剂、过继细胞疗法、酶轴阻断、放疗和经典化疗联合使用。

我们还强调了双重A 2A AR/A 2B AR拮抗剂作为多靶点策略以对抗重叠免疫抑制机制的治疗潜力。总体而言,靶向腺苷轴——尤其是通过双受体阻断——代表了一种有前景的策略,可用于重编程肿瘤微环境、重新激活抗肿瘤免疫并提高癌症免疫治疗的疗效。意义声明:通过腺苷A 2A(A 2A AR)和A 2B(A 2B AR)受体介导的腺苷信号在肿瘤诱导的免疫抑制中发挥核心作用,限制了癌症免疫治疗的疗效。本综述对A 2A AR和A 2B AR在免疫和基质区室中的功能进行了综合分析,总结了当前的选择性拮抗剂(A 2A AR和A 2B AR)和双重拮抗剂,并重点介绍了处于临床研究中的化合物。

此外,还讨论了将腺苷阻断与互补的免疫治疗及常规方法相结合的协同联合策略,以增强抗肿瘤反应。

展开英文摘要原文

The extracellular accumulation of adenosine is a central mechanism of immune evasion within the tumor microenvironment. Elevated adenosine levels-driven by hypoxia, chronic inflammation, and upregulated ectonucleotidase activity, primarily through ectonucleoside triphophate diphosphoydrolase 1 and ecto-5'-nucleotidase-induce profound immunosuppression and promote tumor progression. In this setting, adenosine acts mainly through 2 G protein-coupled receptors, the adenosine A 2A receptor (A 2A AR) and the adenosine A 2B receptor (A 2B AR), which modulate diverse immune and stromal cell populations.

A 2A AR signaling suppresses the effector activity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and natural killer cells, whereas A 2B AR activation exerts broader effects by amplifying myeloid-derived immunosuppression, driving stromal remodeling, and fostering angiogenesis and metastatic dissemination. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the distinct and converging roles of A 2A AR and A 2B AR in immune, stromal, and tumor compartments.

We critically analyze current strategies for developing selective and dual A 2A AR/A 2B AR antagonists, with a focus on structure-activity relationships, scaffold optimization, and pharmacokinetic profiling.

In addition, we examine ongoing clinical trials and emerging combination therapies involving A 2A AR and A 2B AR antagonists in conjunction with immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell therapies, enzymatic axis blockade, radiotherapy, and classical chemotherapy.

We also underscore the therapeutic potential of dual A 2A AR/A 2B AR antagonists as a multitarget approach to counteract overlapping immunosuppressive mechanisms.

Overall, targeting the adenosine axis-particularly through dual receptor blockade-represents a promising strategy for reprograming the tumor microenvironment, reinvigorating antitumor immunity, and improving the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Adenosine signaling via adenosine A 2A (A 2A AR) and A 2B (A 2B AR) receptors plays a central role in tumor-induced immunosuppression, limiting the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy.

This review provides an integrated analysis of A 2A AR and A 2B AR functions across immune and stromal compartments, summarizes current selective antagonists (A 2A AR and A 2B AR) and dual antagonists, and highlights compounds in clinical studies.

Moreover, it discusses synergistic combination strategies that integrate adenosine blockade with complementary immunotherapeutic and conventional approaches to enhance antitumor responses.

论文信息

作者
Rodríguez-Pampín I、González-Pico L、Selas A、Andújar A、Prieto-Díaz R、Sotelo E
第一作者单位
Center for Research in Biological Chemistry and Molecular Materials (CiQUS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.Chile
通讯作者单位
Center for Research in Biological Chemistry and Molecular Materials (CiQUS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Electronic address: e.sotelo@usc.es.Chile
文献类型
综述
期刊
Pharmacological reviews2025 Nov
原文标识
PubMed 41101027 · DOI 10.1016/j.pharmr.2025.100092