CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Unlocking the Potential of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Unlocking the Potential of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
激素受体阳性(HR+)/HER2阴性(HER2−)乳腺癌(BC)具有免疫原性低和微环境免疫抑制等特点。这些特征可能导致免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)在该乳腺癌亚型中的临床活性不一致。我们系统综述评估HR+/HER2− BC患者ICI疗法的临床试验,重点分析潜在应答及耐药生物标志物。
系统检索PubMed收录的Medline、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库,查找2013至2023年发表的II/III期临床试验;纳入任何分期HR+/HER2− BC患者接受ICI单药或联合其他药物治疗的研究。所有检索截至2024年1月27日。提取研究特征、临床结局和生物标志物谱数据。由于研究异质性较高,采用叙述性综合,未评估偏倚风险,也未进行荟萃分析。
共纳入25项研究,总计3,298名患者,其中18项试验纳入晚期患者。所有试验均研究ICI联合方案,较常见的联合药物为化疗、CDK4/6抑制剂或其他免疫疗法。多数纳入晚期患者的研究未显示ICI具有显著临床活性。在早期治疗情境中,nivolumab或pembrolizumab联合化疗新辅助治疗相比单独化疗提高了完全缓解率。此外,PD-L1高表达、ER(雌激素受体)低表达和TIL水平较高均与结局改善相关。与此一致,MammaPrint High 2(MP2)基因组特征等免疫活化增强标志物与更高ICI敏感性相关。讨论:尽管总体疗效有限,ICI仍可能是部分HR+/HER2− BC患者可行的治疗选择。但本系统综述受到研究异质性及纳入进行中或未成熟试验的限制,无法开展定量分析,也可能影响未来对该亚型ICI疗效的结论。最后,优化联合策略可能提高肿瘤免疫原性;PD-L1、TIL或特定基因组特征等预测性生物标志物,则有助于识别应答患者。
Background: Hormone-receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) is characterized by low immunogenicity and an immunosuppressive microenvironment. These features likely contribute to the inconsistent clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in this BC subtype.
We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials evaluating ICIs in HR+/HER2- BC patients, focusing on potential biomarkers of response and resistance to these drugs. Methods: We systematically searched in Medline via PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for phase II/III clinical trials published between 2013 and 2023, testing ICIs alone or in combination with other agents in HR+/HER2- BC patients at any stage. All the searches were performed up to 27 January 2024. Data on study characteristics, clinical outcomes, and biomarker profiles were extracted, and due to study heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was performed, without risk-of-bias assessment or meta-analysis.
Results: Twenty-five studies were included, with 3298 patients enrolled overall. Eighteen of these trials enrolled patients with advanced disease. All trials investigated ICI combination regimens, more frequently with chemotherapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors, or other immunotherapeutic agents.
Most of the studies enrolling patients with advanced disease failed to show a significant clinical activity of ICIs. In the early setting, neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with nivolumab or pembrolizumab increased the rate of complete responses compared to chemotherapy alone.
Moreover, high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, low ER (estrogen receptor), and high tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels correlated with improved outcomes. Consistently, markers indicating enhanced immune activation, such as the MammaPrint High 2 (MP2) genomic signature, were associated with increased ICI sensitivity. Discussion: Despite the limited overall efficacy, ICIs may represent a viable therapeutic option for a selected subset of HR+/HER2- BC patients.
However, this systematic review is limited by study heterogeneity and the inclusion of ongoing or immature trials, which prevents quantitative analysis and may affect future conclusions on ICIs in HR+/HER2- breast cancer.
Finally, optimized combination strategies could enhance tumor immunogenicity, while predictive biomarkers such as PD-L1, TILs, or specific genomic signatures could identify responsive patients.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。