← 返回

M1 巨噬细胞——对肿瘤进展的意外贡献

英文原题:M1 macrophages - unexpected contribution to tumor progression.

查看英文原题

M1 macrophages - unexpected contribution to tumor progression.

PubMed 2025/07/31(内容时间) Front Immunol Q1 · IF 7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

免疫系统抗肿瘤作用长期以来与干扰素-γ介导的免疫细胞活化及其识别和清除转化细胞的能力相关。肿瘤免疫编辑的基本原理描述了免疫系统与肿瘤细胞之间的动态相互作用,其中免疫压力可能悖论性地塑造肿瘤进化。

在此背景下,巨噬细胞、NK 细胞和T淋巴细胞是抗肿瘤免疫的核心效应细胞。传统上,表现为M1表型的巨噬细胞以高细胞毒性潜力为特征,被认为是肿瘤清除的重要贡献者。相比之下,M2极化的肿瘤相关巨噬细胞与免疫抑制和肿瘤进展相关。

然而,近期证据挑战了这一二元范式。越来越明显的是,M1巨噬细胞虽然最初发挥抗肿瘤作用,但也可通过施加持续的细胞毒性压力选择更具恶性且免疫抵抗的肿瘤克隆,从而促进肿瘤进展。这一现象代表了细胞毒性巨噬细胞对肿瘤进展的意外且被忽视的贡献。在本综述中,我们审视M1巨噬细胞复杂的、依赖背景的功能,并重新评估当前旨在增强其细胞毒性的策略。虽然此类方法可能提供短期获益,但它们有驱动侵袭性、免疫逃逸肿瘤细胞克隆选择的风险。

因此,我们提出范式转变:不应仅促进M1极化,治疗策略应考虑巨噬细胞-肿瘤相互作用的更广泛后果。对巨噬细胞可塑性和肿瘤动力学的细致理解对于设计有效的免疫治疗至关重要。认识到M1巨噬细胞的悖论性作用对于避免对肿瘤进化的非预期支持并改善治疗结局至关重要。

展开英文摘要原文

The anti-tumor role of the immune system has long been associated with interferon-γ-mediated activation of immune cells and their ability to recognize and eliminate transformed cells. Fundamental principles of tumor immunoediting describe a dynamic interplay between the immune system and neoplastic cells, wherein immune pressure can paradoxically shape tumor evolution.

Within this context, macrophages, natural killer cells, and T lymphocytes are central effectors of anti-tumor immunity. Traditionally, macrophages exhibiting M1 phenotype are characterized by high cytotoxic potential and considered important contributors to tumor eradication. In contrast, M2-polarized tumor-associated macrophages are associated with immune suppression and tumor progression.

However, recent evidence challenges this binary paradigm. It is increasingly evident that M1 macrophages, while initially exerting anti-tumor effects, can also promote tumor progression by applying sustained cytotoxic pressure that selects for more malignant and immune-resistant tumor clones.

This phenomenon represents an unexpected and overlooked contribution of cytotoxic macrophages to tumor progression. In this review, we examine the complex, context-dependent function of M1 macrophages and reassess current strategies aimed at enhancing their cytotoxicity. While such approaches may offer short-term benefits, they risk driving clonal selection of aggressive, immune-evasive tumor cells.

Therefore, we propose a paradigm shift: instead of promoting M1 polarization alone, therapeutic strategies should consider the broader consequences of macrophage-tumor interactions. A nuanced understanding of macrophage plasticity and tumor dynamics is essential for designing effective immunotherapies. Recognizing the paradoxical role of M1 macrophages is critical to avoiding unintended support of tumor evolution and improving treatment outcomes.

论文信息

作者
Kovaleva OV、Rashidova MA、Sinyov VV、Malashenko OS、Gratchev A
单位
Institute of Carcinogenesis, N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia.Russia
文献类型
综述
期刊
Frontiers in immunology2025
原文标识
PubMed 40821768 · DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1638102