CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Longitudinal graphics of patient-reported physical function in patients treated for hematologic malignancies.
Longitudinal graphics of patient-reported physical function in patients treated for hematologic malignancies.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
患者报告的 PF 为癌症试验中治疗耐受性的评估提供了信息。在本研究中,通过迭代过程开发的身体功能数据总结和可视化得到了患者、临床医生和 FDA 利益相关者的好评。未来需要在临床、监管、支付方和患者利益相关者中系统评估各种分析和可视化方法解释准确性的工作,这是必要的下一步。
美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 发布了一份指导文件草案,详细介绍了癌症临床试验中患者报告的核心结果,包括身体功能 (PF)。本研究的目的是开发癌症患者报告的 PF 的分析方法和可视化。
我们将估计框架应用于患者报告的耐受性终点,以开发横断面和随时间变化的数据摘要以及可视化。我们通过使用血液恶性肿瘤的三个临床试验数据集与临床医生、统计学家和 FDA 利益相关者进行迭代反馈来实现这一目标。图形方法应用于血液恶性肿瘤的三个数据集:(1) 参加 MPN-RC 111/112 试验的骨髓增生性肿瘤患者在 12 个月内完成了 EORTC QLQ-C30; (2)接受CAR-T 细胞治疗或自体移植且完成FACT问卷超过6个月的血液恶性肿瘤患者; (3) 多发性骨髓瘤或淀粉样变性患者完成 PROMIS-29 问卷超过 6 个月。对两个利益相关者群体(临床医生/临床研究人员和患者倡导者)进行了 Zoom 民意调查,以征求反馈。
可视化包括堆积条形图、相对于基线的算术平均变化线图、饼图、华夫饼图和 PF 数据的瀑布图。图形考虑了比例分数和单个项目,并包括每个时间点 PRO 完成率的描述。包括适用的置信区间和参考线,并实施色盲可访问的颜色以确保所有可视化的包容性。随着时间的推移,报告“最差”变化的数据摘要很难解释。就利益相关者的偏好而言,患者更喜欢堆叠条形图,而临床医生同样青睐堆叠条形图和线图;与饼图相比,患者和临床医生都更喜欢瀑布图。患者反馈强调需要各种图形来传达群体级别趋势和详细的个体患者级别信息。
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a draft guidance document detailing core patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials, including physical function (PF). The objectives of this study were to develop analytic methods and visualizations of patient-reported PF in patients with cancer.
We applied an estimand framework to a patient-reported tolerability endpoint to develop data summaries cross-sectionally and over time, along with visualizations. We accomplished this through iterative feedback with clinicians, statisticians, and FDA stakeholders using three clinical trial datasets in hematologic malignancies. Graphical approaches were applied to three datasets in hematologic malignancies: (1) patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms enrolled in MPN-RC 111/112 trials completed EORTC QLQ-C30 over 12 months; (2) patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing CAR-T cell therapy or autologous transplant who completed FACT questionnaires over 6 months; and (3) patients with multiple myeloma or amyloidosis who completed the PROMIS-29 questionnaire over 6 months. Zoom polls were administered to two stakeholder groups (clinicians/clinical investigators and patient advocates) to elicit feedback.
Visualizations included stacked bar charts, line plots of arithmetic mean changes from baseline, pie charts, waffle plots, and waterfall plots of PF data. Graphics considered scaled scores and individual items and included delineation of PRO completion rate at each time point. Confidence intervals and reference lines were included as applicable, and colorblind accessible colors were implemented to ensure inclusivity of all visualizations. Data summaries over time reporting "worst" change were difficult to interpret. In terms of stakeholders' preference, patients preferred stacked bar charts while clinicians equally favored stacked bar charts and line plots; both patients and clinicians preferred waterfall plots to pie charts. Patient feedback highlighted the need for various graphics to convey group level trends and granular individual-patient level information.
Patient-reported PF informs the evaluation of treatment tolerability in cancer trials. Data summaries and visualizations of physical function developed through an iterative process were reviewed favorably by patients, clinicians and FDA stakeholders in this study. Future work to systematically assess accuracy of interpretation of the various analytic and visualization methods is a necessary next step across clinical, regulatory, payer and patient stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01259817, NCT01259856.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。