CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Novel CD19 Fast-CAR-T cells vs. CD19 conventional CAR-T cells for the treatment of relapsed/refractory CD19-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Novel CD19 Fast-CAR-T cells vs. CD19 conventional CAR-T cells for the treatment of relapsed/refractory CD19-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
与 C-CAR-T 细胞疗法相比,F-CAR-T 细胞疗法具有更高的缓解率,但也导致 CRS/ICANS 发生率增加,但可耐受。需要进一步研究探讨 allo-HSCT 作为 CAR-T 细胞疗法后中间治疗的作用。
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞治疗在复发/难治性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(R/R B-ALL)患者中显示出有前景的疗效,尽管准备这种治疗的过程通常需要很长时间。我们最近创建了CD19 Fast-CAR-T(F-CAR-T)细胞,可在一天内生产完成。本研究的目的是评估和对比CD19 F-CAR-T 细胞与CD19常规CAR-T 细胞在R/R B-ALL管理中的有效性和安全性。
对44例R/R B-ALL患者的临床数据进行了一项多中心、回顾性分析。总体而言,23例患者接受了创新型CD19 F-CAR-T 细胞治疗(F-CAR-T 组),而21例患者接受了CD19常规CAR-T 细胞治疗(C-CAR-T 组)。我们比较了两组之间的完全缓解(CR)率、微小残留病(MRD)阴性CR率、无白血病生存期(LFS)、总生存期(OS)以及细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)的发生率。
与C-CAR-T 组相比,F-CAR-T 组的CR率和MRD阴性率显著更高(分别为95.7%和91.3%;分别为71.4%和66.7%;P = 0.036和P = 0.044)。两组在1年或2年LFS或OS率方面未观察到显著差异:F-CAR-T 组与C-CAR-T 组的1年和2年LFS分别为47.8%和43.5% vs. 38.1%和23.8%(P = 0.384和P = 0.216),而1年和2年OS率分别为65.2%和56.5% vs. 52.4%和47.6%(P = 0.395和P = 0.540)。此外,在CAR-T 细胞治疗后接受异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)的CR患者中,1年或2年LFS或OS率均无显著差异:分别为57.1%和50.0% vs. 47.8%和34.8%(P = 0.506和P = 0.356),64.3%和57.1% vs. 65.2%和56.5%(P = 0.985和P = 0.883)。F-CAR-T 组的CRS发生率(91.3%)高于C-CAR-T 组(66.7%)(P = 0.044)。F-CAR-T 组的ICANS发生率(30.4%)也高于C-CAR-T 组(9.5%)(P = 0.085),但两组均未发生治疗相关死亡。
Treatment with chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cells has shown promising effectiveness in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL), although the process of preparing for this therapy usually takes a long time. We have recently created CD19 Fast-CAR-T (F-CAR-T) cells, which can be produced within a single day. The objective of this study was to evaluate and contrast the effectiveness and safety of CD19 F-CAR-T cells with those of CD19 conventional CAR-T cells in the management of R/R B-ALL.
A multicenter, retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 44 patients with R/R B-ALL was conducted. Overall, 23 patients were administered with innovative CD19 F-CAR-T cells (F-CAR-T group), whereas 21 patients were given CD19 conventional CAR-T cells (C-CAR-T group). We compared the rates of complete remission (CR), minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR, leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), and the incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) between the two groups.
Compared with the C-CAR-T group, the F-CAR-T group had significantly higher CR and MRD-negative rates (95.7% and 91.3%, respectively; 71.4% and 66.7%, respectively; P = 0.036 and P = 0.044). No significant differences were observed in the 1-year or 2-year LFS or OS rates between the two groups: the 1-year and 2-year LFS for the F-CAR-T group vs. C-CAR-T group were 47.8% and 43.5% vs . 38.1% and 23.8% ( P = 0.384 and P = 0.216), while the 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 65.2% and 56.5% vs . 52.4% and 47.6% ( P = 0.395 and P = 0.540). Additionally, among CR patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) following CAR-T-cell therapy, there were no significant differences in the 1-year or 2-year LFS or OS rates: 57.1% and 50.0% vs . 47.8% and 34.8% ( P = 0.506 and P = 0.356), 64.3% and 57.1% vs . 65.2% and 56.5% ( P = 0.985 and P = 0.883), respectively. The incidence of CRS was greater in the F-CAR-T group (91.3%) than in the C-CAR-T group (66.7%) ( P = 0.044). The incidence of ICANS was also greater in the F-CAR-T group (30.4%) than in the C-CAR-T group (9.5%) ( P = 0.085), but no treatment-related deaths occurred in the two groups.
Compared with C-CAR-T-cell therapy, F-CAR-T-cell therapy has a superior remission rate but also leads to a tolerably increased incidence of CRS/ICANS. Further research is needed to explore the function of allo-HSCT as an intermediary therapy after CAR-T-cell therapy.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。