← 返回

CAR-T 细胞治疗患者电子患者报告结局(ePRO)系统的指标选择:一项改良 Delphi 共识研究

英文原题:Measure selection for an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) system for CAR T-cell therapy patients: a modified Delphi consensus study.

查看英文原题

Measure selection for an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) system for CAR T-cell therapy patients: a modified Delphi consensus study.

PubMed 2025/05/28(内容时间) EClinicalMedicine Q1 · IF 12.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在缺乏针对 CAR-T 细胞疗法的 PRO 测量工具选择指南的情况下,基于共识的方法代表着在这一临床人群中应用 PRO 的重要一步。样本量较小以及患者亚组的代表性是本研究的局限性。

研究思路结论见上方概要

嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法可有效治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤,但存在毒性风险和显著的症状负担。患者报告结局(PROs)可显著改善接受这些治疗患者的临床管理。然而,关于选择PRO测量工具以监测CAR-T 细胞治疗后不良事件和生活质量的指导有限。本研究旨在就CAR-T 细胞治疗临床环境中电子PRO(ePRO)系统所用PRO测量工具的选择,在患者和医疗保健专业人员之间达成共识。

一项两轮改良Delphi研究(在线调查和共识会议)于2023年12月至2024年1月开展,旨在为ePRO系统选择PRO测量工具,以包含四个测量域的概念框架为指导:症状负担、癌症和CAR-T 细胞治疗的影响、治疗耐受性以及健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。通过数据库检索(PubMed、ePROVIDE、COSMIN和COMET)以及癌症特异性PRO测量工具的许可网站,共识别出113个PRO测量工具。治疗耐受性和HRQoL域已预先指定测量工具,并通过概念映射为其余域建立概念覆盖。7个PRO测量工具进入候选清单,预先设定的纳入阈值和停止标准指导了Delphi专家组选择。注册:ISRCTN11232653。

19名参与者(5名CAR-T 细胞患者,14名医疗保健专业人员/研究人员)从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)细胞治疗中心和专业网络招募,参加了第一轮(Delphi在线调查)。入围的测量工具针对癌症和CAR-T 细胞治疗领域的症状负担与影响,在相关性、全面性和易于理解性方面进行了评分。第一轮后达成共识,因此无需进行第二轮(共识会议)。症状负担问卷(SBQ)和成人癌症幸存者生活质量量表(QLACS)被选中分别代表症状负担和影响领域。这些测量工具、测量HRQoL的EQ5D-5L,以及作为癌症治疗耐受性单条目总体指标的慢性病治疗功能评估-条目GP5(FACT-GP5),将被纳入ePRO系统。

展开英文摘要原文

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies are effective for treating haematological cancers but carry risks of toxicity and substantial symptom burden. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) could significantly enhance clinical management for patients undergoing these treatments. However, guidance on selection of PRO measures for monitoring adverse event and quality of life after CAR T-cell therapy is limited. This study aimed to achieve consensus among patients and healthcare professionals on the selection of PRO measures for an electronic PRO (ePRO) system for CAR T-cell therapy clinical settings.

Two-round modified Delphi study (online survey and consensus meeting) conducted from December 2023 to January 2024 to select PRO measures for the ePRO system, guided by a conceptual framework with four measurement domains: symptom burden, impacts of cancer and CAR T-cell therapy, treatment tolerability, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Database searches (PubMed, ePROVIDE, COSMIN, and COMET) and licensing websites of cancer-specific PRO measures identified 113 PRO measures. Measures were pre-specified for treatment tolerability and HRQoL domains and concept mapping established conceptual coverage for the remaining domains. Seven PRO measures were shortlisted and prespecified inclusion thresholds and stopping criteria guided Delphi panel selection. Registration: ISRCTN11232653.

Nineteen participants (5 CAR T-cell patients, 14 healthcare professionals/researchers) recruited from a UK National Health Service (NHS) cellular therapy centre and professional networks took part in Round One (Delphi online survey). Shortlisted measures were rated for relevance, comprehensiveness, and ease of understanding for the symptom burden and impacts of cancer and CAR T-cell treatment domains. Consensus was achieved after Round One, precluding the requirement for Round 2 (consensus meeting). The Symptom Burden Questionnaire (SBQ ) and the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) were selected to represent the Symptom Burden and Impacts domains, respectively. These measures, EQ5D-5L, measuring HRQoL, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Item GP5 (FACT-GP5), single-item global indicator of cancer treatment tolerability, will be included in the ePRO system. INTERPRETATION: In the absence of guidance on PRO measure selection for CAR T-cell therapies, consensus-based methods represent an important step towards use of PROs with this clinical population. Modest sample size and representativeness of the patient subgroup are limitations of this study. FUNDING: This study is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision Cellular Therapeutics (NIHR203339). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS Blood and Transplant, or the Department of Health and Social Care.

论文信息

作者
Hughes SE、Khatsuria F、McMullan C、Shaw KL、Walker A、Kinsella F、Burns D、Aiyegbusi OL
单位
Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.United Kingdom
期刊
EClinicalMedicine2025 Jun
原文标识
PubMed 40510921 · DOI 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103256