← 返回

在 3b 期试验中接受不符合规格的 tisagenlecleucel 治疗的日本患者的临床结局

英文原题:Clinical outcomes of Japanese patients treated with out-of-specification tisagenlecleucel in a phase 3b trial.

查看英文原题

Clinical outcomes of Japanese patients treated with out-of-specification tisagenlecleucel in a phase 3b trial.

PubMed 2025/04/18(内容时间) Cytotherapy Q1 · IF 4.5(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

尽管患者样本量有限,我们的研究结果证实,输注 OOS tisagenlecleucel 是一种可行选择,未观察到毒性增加,且结局与临床和真实世界研究中符合规格的产品相当。

中文摘要

最终生产的替雷利珠单抗细胞产品必须符合商业产品放行标准,以确保其安全性、纯度、身份和效力。然而,由于患者来源起始细胞特性不一且生产流程复杂,产品偶尔可能无法达到这些标准。未达到至少一项商业放行标准的最终产品称为“超规格”(OOS)产品。目前尚未充分阐明OOS替雷利珠单抗的获益–风险特征。

评估OOS替雷利珠单抗治疗日本复发/难治性(r/r)弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)和B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)患者的安全性和疗效。

这是一项单臂、开放标签、多中心3b期研究(NCT04094311)。纳入符合说明书适应证的患者并随访3个月。

2019年12月至2022年5月,日本13家合格中心共纳入29例患者,其中28例接受替雷利珠单抗;这28例中23例为r/r DLBCL,5例为r/r B-ALL。r/r DLBCL组产品超规格的主要原因为细胞活率低(24批中15批)和剂量低(23批中8批);r/r B-ALL组的主要原因为剂量高(5批中4批)。r/r DLBCL患者中,分别有3例和1例发生3或4级细胞因子释放综合征及免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征。23例r/r DLBCL患者中有15例接受疗效评估,其中6例达到完全缓解,1例在3个月内的最佳疗效为部分缓解。

尽管患者样本量有限,我们的发现证实输注OOS替雷利珠单抗是一种可行选择;未观察到毒性增加,临床研究和真实世界研究中的结局也与符合规格的产品相当。

展开英文摘要原文

The final manufactured tisagenlecleucel product should meet the commercial product release specifications to ensure the quality in terms of safety, purity, identity, and potency. However, it may occasionally fail to meet these specifications due to the nature of patient-derived cells with variable properties as starting material and the complex manufacturing process. The final product that does not meet at least one of the commercial release specifications is referred to as "out-of-specification" (OOS). However, the benefit-risk profile of OOS tisagenlecleucel has not yet been fully elucidated. AIMS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of OOS tisagenlecleucel in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

This is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase 3b study (NCT04094311). Patients consistent with label indication were enrolled and followed-up for 3 months.

Of the 29 patients enrolled between December 2019 and May 2022 across 13 qualified sites in Japan, 28 received tisagenlecleucel, and of these, 23 had r/r DLBCL and 5 had r/r B-ALL. The primary reasons for OOS were low cell viability (15 of 24 batches) and low dose (8 of 23 batches) tisagenlecleucel in the r/r DLBCL group, and high dose (4 of 5 batches) in the r/r B-ALL group. In patients with r/r DLBCL, the grade 3 or 4 cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 3 and 1 patients, respectively. Response assessments were performed for 15 of 23 patients with r/r DLBCL: 6 achieved a complete response, and 1 achieved a partial response as the best response within 3 months.

Despite the limited patient sample size, our findings affirm that the infusion of OOS tisagenlecleucel is a viable option, with no observed increase in toxicity and outcomes comparable to those of in-specification products in clinical and real-world studies.

论文信息

作者
Kato K、Kato J、Goto H、Kobayashi T、Takahashi Y、Sakaida E、Hiramatsu H、Yamamoto M
单位
Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan. Electronic address: kato.koji.429@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp.Japan
文献类型
III 期临床试验 · 多中心研究
期刊
Cytotherapy2025 Aug
原文标识
PubMed 40377509 · DOI 10.1016/j.jcyt.2025.04.067