CD81 通过阻断 CD274/PD-L1 的选择性自噬降解驱动放射抵抗性胶质母细胞瘤的免疫逃逸
CD81 drives immune evasion in radioresistant glioblastoma by blocking selective autophagic degradation of CD274/PD-L1.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Depressive Disorder Affects TME and Hormonal Changes Promoting Tumour Deterioration Development.
Depressive Disorder Affects TME and Hormonal Changes Promoting Tumour Deterioration Development.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
癌症患者常伴有抑郁,抑郁的存在会促进癌症患者病情的恶化,从而影响患者的生存。然而,抑郁与肿瘤进展之间关系的确切机制仍不清楚,这种复杂性涉及多系统、多层次的相互作用,当前研究仍存在若干关键挑战。第一,生物系统的极端复杂性。抑郁和肿瘤分别涉及神经内分泌、免疫系统、代谢等多条通路,而这些通路之间存在非线性相互作用(例如HPA轴激活既影响免疫抑制又影响肿瘤血管生成),因此难以分离出单一机制的主导作用,并且存在反馈回路(例如炎症因子(如IL-6)既可诱发抑郁症状又可促进肿瘤生长),形成“抑郁与肿瘤之间的反馈回路”,使得因果关系方向难以确定。第二,机制研究的潜在盲区。脑-肿瘤轴缺乏直接证据,已知迷走神经或交感神经可直接调节肿瘤微环境(TME)(例如通过β-肾上腺素能受体),但缺乏关于CNS如何通过神经回路远程影响肿瘤的活体成像技术支持;而抑郁相关的肠道菌群紊乱,或在肿瘤发展的某些阶段(例如转移性)或特定微环境(例如高浸润T细胞区域可能对肿瘤产生长期影响,但此类变化在短期实验中难以捕捉,且现有技术无法精确进行时间分辨。
然而,当前研究方法存在局限性。现有研究依赖于慢性应激小鼠模型(如慢性不可预测应激),但小鼠的“抑郁样行为”与人类抑郁症的临床表现存在本质差异,且TME(如免疫组成)与人类不同。
最后,对于癌症相关抑郁症患者,临床治疗通常采用双管齐下的策略,但抗癌药物与抗抑郁药物的联合使用存在局限性,如药物相互作用、安全性问题以及临床实践中个体化治疗的挑战。
因此,通过阐明抑郁症与肿瘤双向效应之间的关系,本综述相对清晰地说明了抑郁症如何通过影响免疫抑制变化、激素变化、谷氨酸/谷氨酸受体及肠道菌群来影响TME,从而促进肿瘤进展。
进一步地,通过上述病理机制,提出了针对该患者群体临床治疗的一些潜在治疗策略;同时,发现抗抑郁药物具有潜在的抗肿瘤活性,其双重药理作用可能为癌症相关抑郁障碍患者提供协同治疗获益。这一发现不仅拓展了肿瘤治疗的药物选择,也为心理肿瘤学领域的综合治疗策略提供了新的理论依据。
Cancer patients often suffer from depression, the presence of which promotes the deterioration of the cancer patient's condition and thus affects the patient's survival.
However, the exact mechanisms underlying the relationship between depression and tumour progression remain unclear, and this complexity involves multi-system and multi-level interactions, with several key challenges remaining in current research. First, the extreme complexity of biological systems. Depression and tumors involve multiple pathways such as neuroendocrine, immune system, and metabolism, respectively, and there are nonlinear interactions between these pathways (e. g. , HPA axis activation affects both immunosuppression and tumor angiogenesis), so it is difficult to isolate the predominant role of a single mechanism, and there are feedback loops (e. g. , inflammatory factors (e. g. , IL-6) can both induce depressive symptoms and promote tumor growth) form a "feedback loop between depression and tumors" that makes it difficult to determine the direction of causality.
Second, the potential blind spot of mechanism research. There is insufficient direct evidence for the brain-tumor axis, and it is known that the vagus nerve or sympathetic nerves can directly modulate the tumor microenvironment (TME) (e. g. , via β-adrenergic receptors), but there is a lack of technical support for in vivo imaging on how the CNS remotely affects tumors through the neural circuits; whereas depression-associated disturbances of the intestinal flora or in certain stages of tumor development (e.
g. , metastatic) or specific microenvironments (e. g. , areas of hyper-infiltrating T-cells) may have long-term effects on the tumors, but such changes are difficult to capture in short-term experiments and cannot be precisely temporally resolved by existing technologies.
However, there are limitations in current research methods. Existing studies have relied on mouse models of chronic stress (e. g. , chronic unpredictable stress), but the "depression-like behaviour" of mice is fundamentally different from the clinical manifestations of depression in humans, and the TME (e. g. , immune composition) is different from that of humans.
Finally, for patients with cancer-associated depression, clinical treatment is usually a two-pronged strategy, but the combination of anticancer and antidepressant drugs has limitations, such as drug-drug interactions, safety issues, and the challenge of individualised treatment in clinical practice.
Therefore, by elucidating the relationship between depression and tumour bidirectional effects, this review relatively clarifies how depression affects TME to promote tumour progression by influencing changes in immunosuppression, hormonal changes, glutamate/glutamate receptors, and intestinal flora.
Further, some potential therapeutic strategies are proposed for the clinical treatment of this group of patients through the above pathological mechanism; at the same time, it was found that antidepressant drugs have potential antitumor activity, and their dual pharmacological effects may provide synergistic therapeutic benefits for patients with cancer-associated depressive disorders.
This finding not only expands the choice of drugs for tumour therapy but also provides a new theoretical basis for comprehensive treatment strategies in the field of psycho-oncology.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。