← 返回

Switch/Sucrose-non-fermentable(Swi/Snf)复合物(ARID1A、SMARCA2、SMARCA4)缺陷型子宫颈内膜腺癌的临床病理特征

英文原题:Clinicopathological characterization of Switch/Sucrose-non-fermentable (Swi/Snf) complex (ARID1A, SMARCA2, SMARCA4)-deficient endocervical adenocarcinoma.

查看英文原题

Clinicopathological characterization of Switch/Sucrose-non-fermentable (Swi/Snf) complex (ARID1A, SMARCA2, SMARCA4)-deficient endocervical adenocarcinoma.

PubMed 2025/04/29(内容时间) Cancer Cell Int Q1 · IF 7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

Swi/Snf 复合物缺陷虽罕见,但与 NHPVA、侵袭性病理特征、免疫激活表型及 MMRD 显著相关。Swi/Snf 状态评估可能为 ECA 患者的新型治疗策略提供依据。

研究思路结论见上方概要

Switch/Sucrose-non-fermentable(Swi/Snf)复合物的亚基,如ARID1A、SMARCA4、SMARCA2等,已被认为与妇科癌症的发生有关。然而,其在宫颈内膜腺癌(ECA)中的患病率和临床意义仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估Swi/Snf复合物亚基在ECA中的表达,并描述Swi/Snf缺陷型ECA的临床病理和免疫微环境特征。

我们使用代表性组织微阵列评估了604例ECA,收集了临床病理数据,回顾了组织学特征,并对几种Swi/Snf复合体亚基、错配修复(MMR)、免疫细胞标志物和免疫检查点配体蛋白进行了免疫组化染色。

在604例受检病例中,共识别出五种Swi/Snf亚基表达模式,包括完整表达、缺失表达、“棋盘格”表达、表达降低和异质性表达。观察到ARID1A(3.97%,24/604)、SMARCA2(2.32%,14/604)和SMARCA4(1.49%,9/604)缺失。将Swi/Snf缺陷定义为任一亚基缺失,总体缺陷率为5.96%(36/604)。Swi/Snf缺陷型ECA倾向于晚期FIGO分期(III-IV,P = 0.041)、更大肿瘤体积(P < 0.001)、更深间质浸润(≥ 1/3,P = 0.046)和更高淋巴结转移率(P = 0.037)。形态学上,Swi/Snf缺陷型ECA常表现为低分化(P = 0.001)、髓样特征(P < 0.001)、高核级别(P < 0.001)、坏死(P = 0.001)、间质TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(sTILs,P < 0.001)、瘤周淋巴细胞聚集(P = 0.001)和三级淋巴结构(TLS,P < 0.001)。免疫亚群分析显示,Swi/Snf缺陷型ECA中CD3⁺ T细胞、CD8⁺ T细胞、CD38⁺浆细胞、CD56⁺ NK细胞、CD68⁺巨噬细胞和PD-1⁺ T细胞密度显著升高(P < 0.05)。Swi/Snf缺陷型ECA表现出更高的PD-L1联合阳性评分(CPS)阳性率(P < 0.001),并且更常与错配修复缺陷(MMRD,P < 0.001)相关。生存分析表明,Swi/Snf缺陷型ECA患者的总生存期(中位:53 vs. 64.5个月,P = 0.0307)和无病生存期(中位:52 vs. 60.5个月,P = 0.0228)更短。

展开英文摘要原文

Subunits of the Switch/Sucrose-non-fermentable (Swi/Snf) complex, such as ARID1A, SMARCA4, SMARCA2, etc., have been implicated in the development of gynecologic cancers. However, their prevalence and clinical implications in endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA) remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the expression of Swi/Snf complex subunits in ECA and characterize the clinicopathological and immune microenvironment features of Swi/Snf-deficient ECA.

We evaluated 604 ECA using representative tissue microarrays, collected clinicopathologic data, reviewed histological features, and performed immunohistochemical staining for several Swi/Snf complex subunits, mismatch repair (MMR), immune cell markers, and immune checkpoint ligands proteins.

Among the 604 cases examined, five Swi/Snf subunit expression patterns were identified, including intact expression, deficient expression, 'checkerboard' expression, reduced expression, and heterogeneous expression. Deficiencies of ARID1A (3.97%, 24/604), SMARCA2 (2.32%,14/604), and SMARCA4 (1.49%, 9/604) were observed. Defining Swi/Snf deficiency as loss of any subunit, the overall deficiency rate was 5.96% (36/604). Swi/Snf-deficient ECA tended to advanced FIGO stage (III-IV, P = 0.041), larger tumor size (P < 0.001), deeper stromal invasion (≥ 1/3, P = 0.046), and higher lymph node metastasis rate (P = 0.037). Morphologically, Swi/Snf-deficient ECA displayed frequent poor differentiation (P = 0.001), medullary features (P < 0.001), high nuclear grade (P < 0.001), necrosis (P = 0.001), stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs, P < 0.001), peritumoral lymphocyte aggregation (P = 0.001), and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS, P < 0.001). Immune subset analysis revealed significantly elevated densities of CD3⁺ T cells, CD8⁺ T cells, CD38⁺ plasma cells, CD56⁺ NK cells, CD68⁺ macrophages, and PD-1⁺ T cells in Swi/Snf-deficient ECA (P < 0.05). Swi/Snf-deficient ECA demonstrated higher PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) positivity (P < 0.001), and was more frequently associated with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRD, P < 0.001). Survival analysis indicated shorter overall survival (median: 53 vs. 64.5 months, P = 0.0307) and disease-free survival (median: 52 vs. 60.5 months, P = 0.0228) in Swi/Snf-deficient ECA patients.

Swi/Snf complex deficiency is rare but significantly associated with NHPVA, aggressive pathological features, immunologically activated phenotypes, and MMRD. Swi/Snf status evaluation may inform novel therapeutic strategies for ECA patients.

论文信息

作者
Cao C、Wu ZY、Liao W、Wei LJ、Liang HY、Yang X、Luo RZ、Liu LL
第一作者单位
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, P.R. China.China
通讯作者单位
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, P.R. China. liulil@sysucc.org.cn.China
期刊
Cancer cell international2025 Apr 29
原文标识
PubMed 40301885 · DOI 10.1186/s12935-025-03794-y