← 返回

桥接强度与多发性骨髓瘤 BCMA CAR-T 治疗后造血恢复受损相关

英文原题:Bridging intensity is associated with impaired hematopoietic recovery after BCMA CAR-T therapy for multiple myeloma.

查看英文原题

Bridging intensity is associated with impaired hematopoietic recovery after BCMA CAR-T therapy for multiple myeloma.

PubMed 2025/08/26(内容时间) Blood Adv Q1 · IF 7.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法是复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)治疗的一项重要进展。然而,从白细胞单采到实际输注CAR-T 细胞往往间隔较长,因此常需桥接治疗。由于对桥接治疗如何影响CAR-T 后的临床病程和结局了解有限,治疗方案的选择颇具挑战。在这项多中心国际观察性研究中,我们探讨了桥接治疗对158例接受靶向B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)CAR-T 治疗的RRMM患者造血重建的影响。根据是否接受传统细胞毒性化疗(CTX),将桥接方案分为非CTX、中等强度CTX(1–2种CTX药物)和高强度CTX(≥3种CTX药物或联合干细胞移植的高剂量治疗)。CTX药物数量与CAR-T 后造血重建受损相关,影响多个造血细胞谱系,且在CAR-T 治疗后晚期尤为明显。高强度CTX桥接与中性粒细胞及血小板恢复时间延长、不同的造血恢复模式(如再次下降的间歇型表型)、严重感染易感性增加,以及单变量和多变量模型中严重晚期血细胞减少风险显著升高相关。

总之,桥接治疗强度会显著影响BCMA CAR-T 治疗后造血恢复轨迹。靶向及新型免疫疗法可作为桥接治疗的替代选择;高危患者可能尤其需要加强监测、预防和支持治疗。

展开英文摘要原文

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR-T) therapy represents a major advance in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

However, the long time span from leukapheresis to actual CAR-T infusion often necessitates bridging therapies. Because of limited knowledge about the effects of bridging on post-CAR-T clinical course and outcomes, the selection of treatment options is challenging.

In this multicenter international observational study, we explored the impact of bridging therapy on hematopoietic reconstitution in 158 patients with RRMM treated with B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR-T therapy. Based on exposure to classical cytotoxic (CTX) chemotherapy, we classified bridging regimens as non-CTX, intermediate CTX (1-2 CTX agents), or intensive CTX ( 3 CTX agents or high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation).

We found associations between the number of CTX agents used and impaired post-CAR-T hematopoietic reconstitution, evident across hematopoietic cell lineages and particularly manifesting during the late post-CAR-T period. Intensive CTX bridging was associated with a prolonged time to neutrophil and platelet recovery, distinct patterns of hematopoietic recovery (eg, an intermittent phenotype characterized by a second drop), an increased susceptibility to severe infections and a significantly increased risk for severe late cytopenias in univariate and multivariate models.

Taken together, these results highlight that bridging intensity distinctly shapes the trajectory of hematopoietic recovery after BCMA CAR-T therapy. Targeted and novel immunotherapies could provide alternatives for bridging, and high-risk patients may particularly benefit from enhanced monitoring, prophylaxis, and supportive care.

论文信息

作者
Frenking JH、Zhou X、Rejeski K、Wagner V、Costello P、Hielscher T、Gatti L、Kauer J
单位
Heidelberg Myeloma Center, Department of Medicine V, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.Germany
文献类型
多中心研究 · 观察性研究
期刊
Blood advances2025 Aug 26
原文标识
PubMed 40267180 · DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015732