← 返回

CAR-T 与贝林妥欧单抗免疫治疗作为桥接移植策略在复发/难治性 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病中的疗效与安全性比较

英文原题:Efficacy and safety comparison of CAR-T and blinatumomab immunotherapy as bridge-to-transplant strategies in relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

查看英文原题

Efficacy and safety comparison of CAR-T and blinatumomab immunotherapy as bridge-to-transplant strategies in relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

PubMed 2025/04/03(内容时间) J Transl Med Q1 · IF 9.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

CAR-T 与贝林妥欧单抗治疗作为 R/R B-ALL 患者桥接 HSCT 的治疗,显示出相当的安全性与疗效。

中文摘要

尽管近期取得进展,B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)仍是治疗挑战。造血干细胞移植(HSCT)可能治愈疾病,但受到多种局限影响。CAR-T 细胞疗法和贝林妥欧单抗等新兴免疫疗法,已显示作为复发/难治(R/R)患者 HSCT 桥接治疗的潜力。

本回顾性研究于 2017 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月在同济医院开展,纳入 36 例接受 HSCT 的 R/R B-ALL 患者。移植前 27 例接受 CD19/CD22 CAR-T 治疗,9 例接受贝林妥欧单抗。评估总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、无移植物抗宿主病且无复发生存(GRFS)和非复发死亡率(NRM),并比较治疗组之间的差异;同时评估造血重建和移植相关并发症。

随访中位时间为 28.07 个月(范围 2.29–92.21 个月)。整个队列 2 年 OS、PFS、GRFS 和 NRM 率分别为 76.54%、54.97%、40.12% 和 9.93%。移植前接受 CAR-T 和贝林妥欧单抗组的 2 年 OS 率分别为 73.89% 和 88.89%(P = 0.862),PFS 率分别为 59.03% 和 44.44%(P = 0.501),GRFS 率分别为 47.86% 和 13.89%(P = 0.083),NRM 率分别为 8.52% 和 11.11%(P = 0.713)。两组安全性相近;造血重建、感染、II–IV 级急性 GVHD 发生率和慢性 GVHD 发生率均无显著差异。

CAR-T 和贝林妥欧单抗作为 R/R B-ALL 患者 HSCT 桥接治疗,安全性和疗效相当。仍需进一步研究优化这些治疗策略。

展开英文摘要原文

Despite recent advances, B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) remains a therapeutic challenge. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) provides a potential cure but is hindered by various limitations. Emerging immunotherapies, including chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy and blinatumomab, have shown potential as bridging strategies to HSCT in relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients.

This retrospective study was conducted at Tongji Hospital from March 2017 to March 2023 and involved 36 R/R B-ALL patients who underwent HSCT. Prior to transplantation, 27 patients received CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy, while 9 received blinatumomab. The outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), graft-versus-host disease-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS), and non-relapse mortality (NRM), with comparisons between treatment groups. Hematopoietic reconstitution and transplant-related complications were also evaluated.

The median follow-up time was 28.07 months (range: 2.29-92.21 months). The 2-year OS, PFS, GRFS, and NRM rates of the entire cohort were 76.54%, 54.97%, 40.12%, and 9.93%, respectively. In the CAR-T and blinatumomab treatment groups before transplantation, the 2-year OS rates were 73.89% and 88.89% (P = 0.862), the PFS rates were 59.03% and 44.44% (P = 0.501), the GRFS rates were 47.86% and 13.89% (P = 0.083), and the NRM rates were 8.52% and 11.11% (P = 0.713), respectively. The safety profiles were similar, with no significant differences observed in hematopoietic reconstitution, infection, incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), or chronic GVHD incidence between the CAR-T and blinatumomab groups.

CAR-T and blinatumomab therapies demonstrate comparable safety and efficacy as bridging treatments to HSCT in patients with R/R B-ALL. Further studies are needed to optimize these treatment strategies.

论文信息

作者
Cao W、Li N、Wang G、Xu H、Yang Y、Wang J、Xu J、Li Y
第一作者单位
Department of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jie-fang Ave, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China.China
通讯作者单位
Department of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jie-fang Ave, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China. wangna.2001@163.com.China
文献类型
对照研究
期刊
Journal of translational medicine2025 Apr 3
原文标识
PubMed 40181350 · DOI 10.1186/s12967-025-06399-1