纵向血浆代谢组学指导食管鳞状细胞癌化疗免疫治疗的动态风险评估与饮食调节
Longitudinal Plasma Metabolomics Guides Dynamic Risk Assessment and Dietary Modulation for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Chemoimmunotherapy.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:The prognosis prediction value of CD69+ CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cell as a novel indicator of pathologic complete response heterogeneity following different neoadjuvant therapy regimen in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
The prognosis prediction value of CD69+ CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cell as a novel indicator of pathologic complete response heterogeneity following different neoadjuvant therapy regimen in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
不同新辅助治疗获得的 pCR 具有不同的预后结局。CD69 + CD8 + TRM 作为潜在的预后预测因子,值得进一步研究。
提高病理完全缓解(pCR)率目前是局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(LA-ESCC)新辅助治疗的主要目标。然而,pCR率的提高并不总能转化为更好的预后,这可能与不同方案的pCR异质性有关。我们研究了两种常用新辅助方案之间的这种异质性及潜在生物标志物。
我们纳入了来自四个中心的445例LA-ESCC患者,其中228例接受新辅助放化疗(nCRT),217例接受新辅助化疗联合免疫治疗(nICT)。倾向性评分匹配确保了组间可比性。我们评估了pCR率及其与总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)和复发模式的相关性。通过RNA测序和免疫浸润分析探讨了免疫相关生物标志物,随后通过多重免疫荧光染色进行验证。
总体而言,与非pCR相比,pCR与显著更高的DFS(HR = 0.3 [0.18-0.5],P < 0.01)和OS(HR = 0.19 [0.08-0.41],P < 0.01)相关。nICT组的pCR率低于nCRT组(27.2% vs. 42.9%),但表现出相当的预后并减少了远处转移。在pCR患者中,nICT组的DFS显著更好(HR = 0.2 [0.05-0.86],P = 0.031),OS有改善趋势。免疫分析显示,nICT pCR组中CD8 + T细胞浸润增加,尤其是CD69 + CD8 + 组织驻留记忆T细胞(TRM)。CD69 + CD8 + TRM细胞的比例与改善的DFS(P = 0.016)和OS(P = 0.015)显著相关,提示它们可能是优于pCR率的预后标志物。
Improving pathological complete response (pCR) rate is currently the main goal of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). However, improved pCR rates do not consistently translate into better prognosis, likely due to regimen-specific pCR heterogeneity. We investigated this heterogeneity and potential biomarkers between two common neoadjuvant regimens.
We included 445 LA-ESCC patients from four centers, with 228 receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and 217 undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (nICT). Propensity score matching ensured group comparability. We assessed pCR rates and their associations with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence patterns. Immune-related biomarkers were investigated through RNA sequencing and immune infiltration analysis, then validated via multiplex immunofluorescence staining.
Overall, pCR was associated with significantly higher DFS (HR = 0.3 [0.18-0.5], P < 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.19 [0.08-0.41], P < 0.01) compared to non-pCR. The nICT group had a lower pCR rate than the nCRT group (27.2% vs. 42.9%) but demonstrated comparable prognosis and reduced distant metastasis. Among pCR patients, DFS was significantly better in the nICT group (HR = 0.2 [0.05-0.86], P = 0.031), with a trend toward improved OS. Immune analysis revealed increased CD8 + T cell infiltration, particularly CD69 + CD8 + tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM), in the nICT pCR group. The proportion of CD69 + CD8 + TRM cells was significantly linked to improved DFS (P = 0.016) and OS (P = 0.015), suggesting they may be superior prognostic markers compared to pCR rates.
The pCR obtained from different neoadjuvant treatments has distinct prognostic outcomes. The CD69 + CD8 + TRM, as a potential prognostic predictor, warrants further investigation.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。