← 返回

既往塞利尼索暴露对复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤 CAR-T 细胞治疗结局的影响:探索性分析

英文原题:Impact of Prior Selinexor Exposure on Outcomes of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Exploratory Analysis.

查看英文原题

Impact of Prior Selinexor Exposure on Outcomes of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Exploratory Analysis.

PubMed 2025/02/16(内容时间) J Clin Med Q1 · IF 3.3(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

本回顾性队列研究的数据来源于美国两家学术中心的电子病历。采用Kaplan-Meier估计评估缓解持续时间(DOR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),以中位数及四分位距(IQR)报告。采用Cox比例风险回归分析可能与PFS和OS相关的因素,以风险比(HR)及95%置信区间(CI)报告。

在45例接受BCMA靶向CAR-T 前暴露于selinexor的患者中,selinexor使用和CAR-T 的中位治疗线数分别为7和9,24.4%的患者将selinexor作为桥接治疗的一部分。在中位随访68个月时,CAR-T 后的中位PFS和OS分别为8.0(IQR 3.1-39.5)和35.9(IQR 14.2-NR)个月。CAR-T 的总体缓解率为89%,中位DOR为8.1个月(IQR 2.9-39.0)。在我们的多变量模型中,在CAR-T 前一线治疗中接受含selinexor方案的患者显示出死亡风险(HR = 0.08;95% CI 0.02-0.46)和/或疾病进展风险(HR = 0.40;95% CI 0.14-1.09)降低的趋势。

在重度经治的RRMM中,既往selinexor暴露似乎不会损害CAR-T 结局,提示其可能具有T细胞保护作用。我们的发现值得开展更大规模的前瞻性研究,以确定抢先使用selinexor治疗能否优化CAR-T 疗效。

展开英文摘要原文

Background/Objectives : Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has become a key treatment option for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), but factors impairing T-cell fitness may diminish efficacy.

Our exploratory analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of prior treatment with a selinexor-containing regimen on CAR-T outcomes for RRMM patients. Methods : Data for this retrospective cohort study were sourced from electronic medical records at two US academic centers. Kaplan-Meier estimates assessed duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), reported as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs).

Cox proportional hazards regression analyzed factors potentially associated with PFS and OS, reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results : Among 45 patients exposed to selinexor before undergoing BCMA-directed CAR-T, median therapy line numbers for selinexor use and CAR-T were 7 and 9, respectively, with 24. 4% receiving selinexor as part of bridging. At median follow-up of 68 months, median PFS and OS post CAR-T were 8. 0 (IQR 3. 1-39. 5) and 35. 9 (IQR 14. 2-NR) months, respectively.

Overall response rate to CAR-T was 89%, with a median DOR of 8. 1 months (IQR 2. 9-39. 0). In our multivariable model, patients who received a selinexor-based regimen in the line of therapy preceding CAR-T showed a trend toward reduced risk of death (HR = 0. 08; 95% CI 0. 02-0. 46) and/or disease progression (HR = 0. 40; 95% CI 0. 14-1. 09). Conclusions : Prior selinexor exposure does not appear to compromise CAR-T outcomes in heavily pretreated RRMM, suggesting potential T-cell sparing.

Our findings warrant larger, prospective studies to determine whether preemptive selinexor treatment can optimize CAR-T efficacy.

论文信息

作者
Costa BA、Dima D、Mark T、Sadek NL、Ijioma S、Ray D、Goel U、Dranitsaris G
单位
Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.United States
期刊
Journal of clinical medicine2025 Feb 16
原文标识
PubMed 40004846 · DOI 10.3390/jcm14041316