← 返回

多发性骨髓瘤患者中 CAR-T 细胞治疗的管理:澳大利亚的系统综述与专家共识

英文原题:Management of CAR-T cell therapy in patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and expert consensus in Australia.

查看英文原题

Management of CAR-T cell therapy in patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and expert consensus in Australia.

PubMed 2025/01/21(内容时间) Front Oncol Q2 · IF 3.4(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

我们的 Delphi 专家组就澳大利亚 MM 患者接受 CAR-T 治疗的筛选、管理流程和后续护理的关键考虑因素达成了专家共识。这将指导制定与澳大利亚卫生系统相关且可行的临床实践指南。

研究思路结论见上方概要

监管机构最近已批准嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞疗法用于多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者,但治疗过程涉及复杂的决策。为支持这些疗法的引入,我们旨在就澳大利亚接受CAR-T 细胞治疗的MM患者管理各方面最佳实践建立共识专家意见。

我们开展了一项改良的RAND/UCLA两轮Delphi专家小组研究,并以一项系统文献综述(SLR)为基础。该SLR纳入了关于CAR-T 细胞治疗MM患者的临床实践指南、干预性试验和观察性研究的证据,以综合与患者管理相关的CAR-T 细胞治疗方法学方面。Delphi专家小组由来自澳大利亚各地的八名血液科医生组成,每位在直接使用CAR-T 疗法治疗患者或将患者转诊接受CAR-T 细胞治疗方面均具有丰富经验。专家组成员以电子方式完成了问卷调查,并在第二轮问卷之前参加了一次虚拟会议,以讨论第一轮问卷的答复。共识事先定义为对调查问题至少达到70%的一致性。

SLR 识别出 22 项干预性或观察性研究以及 5 项临床实践指南,报告了来自全球不同地区接受 CAR-T 细胞治疗的 MM 患者的选择和管理。Delphi 专家组就患者转诊、筛查、选择、优先排序、需要洗脱期的治疗、桥接治疗、淋巴细胞清除、输注以及输注后监测和管理相关实践达成了共识。大多数共识结果与 SLR 纳入指南中一致推荐的实践相符。对于与特定筛查实践和治疗后监测相关的陈述未达成共识,提示对具体实施的最佳实践存在不同意见。

展开英文摘要原文

Regulatory bodies have recently approved chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but the treatment process involves complex decision making. To support the introduction of these therapies, we aimed to establish consensus expert opinion on best practices of all aspects of the management of patients with MM undergoing CAR-T cell therapy in Australia.

We conducted a modified RAND/UCLA two-round Delphi panel informed by a systematic literature review (SLR). The SLR included evidence from clinical practice guidelines, interventional trials, and observational studies for CAR-T cell therapy for patients with MM, to synthesize methodological aspects of CAR-T cell therapy related to patient management. The Delphi panel comprised eight hematologists from across Australia, each with significant experience directly treating patients using CAR-T therapy or referring patients for CAR-T cell therapy. Panelists completed the surveys electronically, and attended a virtual meeting held before the second-round questionnaire to discuss the first-round questionnaire responses. Consensus was defined a priori as at least 70% agreement on survey questions.

The SLR identified 22 interventional or observational studies and 5 clinical practice guidelines reporting on selection and management of patients with MM treated with CAR-T cell therapy from various global regions. The Delphi panel reached consensus on practices related to patient referral, screening, selection, prioritization, treatments requiring wash-out, bridging therapy, lymphodepletion, infusion, and post-infusion monitoring and management. Most consensus results aligned with consistently recommended practices within guidelines included in the SLR. Consensus was not reached for statements related to specific screening practices and post-treatment monitoring, suggesting differing opinions on the specific best practices to implement.

Our Delphi panel established expert consensus on key considerations for patient selection, administrative processes, and aftercare for patients with MM in Australia undergoing CAR-T therapy. This will guide the development of clinical practice guidelines which are relevant and feasible to Australian health systems.

论文信息

作者
Ho PJ、Quach H、Sidiqi MH、Lee CH、Butler J、Spencer A、Micklethwaite K、Li J
第一作者单位
Institute of Haematology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.Australia
通讯作者单位
Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.Australia
文献类型
系统综述
期刊
Frontiers in oncology2024
原文标识
PubMed 39906669 · DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1535869