← 返回

达雷妥尤单抗难治性多发性骨髓瘤的结局与预后指标:elotuzumab、泊马度胺与地塞米松治疗 247 例患者的多中心真实世界研究

英文原题:Outcomes and prognostic indicators in daratumumab-refractory multiple myeloma: a multicenter real-world study of elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in 247 patients.

查看英文原题

Outcomes and prognostic indicators in daratumumab-refractory multiple myeloma: a multicenter real-world study of elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in 247 patients.

PubMed 2025/01/07(内容时间) ESMO Open Q1 · IF 10.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

本研究支持 EloPd 作为 Dara-R MM 患者的有效治疗选择,可提供有价值的疾病控制,并作为 CAR-T 和双特异性抗体等新疗法的潜在桥接。

研究思路结论见上方概要

daratumumab 难治性多发性骨髓瘤(Dara-R MM)是一项重大的治疗挑战。本研究旨在评估 elotuzumab、pomalidomide 和 dexamethasone(EloPd)方案在大型真实世界 Dara-R MM 患者队列中的疗效与生存结局,尤其关注无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。

这项回顾性分析纳入了247例接受EloPd治疗的Dara-R MM患者。所有患者也对来那度胺难治,其中51.4%对蛋白酶体抑制剂难治,因此被归类为三类药物难治(TCR)。开发了PFS生存风险评分系统(progression-free risk score-PRS DaraR)和OS生存风险评分系统(survival risk score-SRS DaraR),以根据患者的风险特征对其进行分层。

总体缓解率为 52.6%,中位 PFS 和 OS 分别为 6.6 个月和 17.0 个月。在多变量分析中,国际分期系统(ISS)II 期和 III 期、低血红蛋白(Hb)水平、末次治疗为 daratumumab 以及症状性复发被确定为 PFS 较短的显著独立预测因素。除 ISS 晚期外,低 Hb 水平(<10.6 g/dl)、症状性复发/难治性疾病对 OS 也表现出独立的负面影响。重要的是,TCR 与非 TCR 患者在 PFS 和 OS 方面均未观察到显著差异。基于这些多变量分析,我们根据风险比的幅度开发了 PRS DaraR 和 SRS DaraR。在 PRS DaraR 中,10.1% 为低危,41.3% 为中危,43.3% 为高危,5.3% 为极高危。12 个月 PFS 概率分别为 86.3%(低危)、67.6%(中危)、52.9%(高危)和 31.8%(极高危)。对于 SRS DaraR,6.1% 为低危,47.8% 为中危,19.4% 为高危,26.7% 为极高危。12 个月 OS 概率分别为 90.9%(低危)、75.7%(中危)、55.9%(高危)和 32.6%(极高危)。

展开英文摘要原文

Daratumumab-refractory multiple myeloma (Dara-R MM) presents a significant treatment challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and survival outcomes of elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (EloPd) in a large, real-world cohort of patients with Dara-R MM, with particular focus on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

This retrospective analysis included 247 Dara-R MM patients treated with EloPd. All patients were also refractory to lenalidomide, with 51.4% to a proteasome inhibitor, thus classified as triple-class refractory (TCR). Survival risk-scoring systems for PFS (progression-free risk score-PRS DaraR ) and OS (survival risk score-SRS DaraR ) were developed to stratify patients based on their risk profiles.

The overall response rate was 52.6%, with a median PFS and OS of 6.6 and 17.0 months, respectively. The International Staging System (ISS) stages II and III, low hemoglobin (Hb) levels, the last therapy being daratumumab, and symptomatic relapse were identified as significant independent predictors of shorter PFS in multivariable analysis. In addition to advanced ISS stages, low Hb levels (<10.6 g/dl), symptomatic relapse, and refractory disease exhibited an independent negative impact on OS. Importantly, no significant differences in both PFS and OS were observed between TCR and non-TCR patients. Based on these multivariable analyses, we developed PRS DaraR and SRS DaraR according to the magnitude of the hazard ratio. In PRS DaraR , 10.1% were low-risk, 41.3% intermediate, 43.3% high, and 5.3% very high-risk. The 12-month PFS probabilities were 86.3% (low), 67.6% (intermediate), 52.9% (high), and 31.8% (very high). For SRS DaraR , 6.1% were low-risk, 47.8% intermediate, 19.4% high, and 26.7% very high. The 12-month OS probabilities were 90.9% (low), 75.7% (intermediate), 55.9% (high), and 32.6% (very high).

This study supports EloPd as an effective treatment option in Dara-R MM patients, providing valuable disease control and acting as a potential bridge to newer therapies, such as CAR-T and bispecific antibodies.

论文信息

作者
Martino EA、Palmieri S、Galli M、Derudas D、Mina R、Della Pepa R、Zambello R、Vigna E
第一作者单位
Department of Onco-hematology, Hematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Annunziata, Cosenza, Italy.Italy
通讯作者单位
Department of Onco-hematology, Hematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Annunziata, Cosenza, Italy; Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Science, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy. Electronic address: massim.gentile@tiscali.it.Italy
文献类型
多中心研究 · 观察性研究
期刊
ESMO open2025 Feb
原文标识
PubMed 39778329 · DOI 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104084