决定异体 CAR T 细胞排斥与扩增的细胞和分子机制
Cellular and molecular mechanisms determining allogeneic CAR T cell rejection and expansion.
我们评估了11例接受单一批次cemacabtagene ansegedleucel(cema-cel)治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,cemacabtagene ansegedleucel是一种异体抗CD19 CAR T产品。
英文原题:Evaluation of MAGE-A4 expression in breast cancer and its impact on prognosis.
E701U抗体在MAGE家族基因中对MAGE-A4表达显示出可靠的特异性。
黑色素瘤相关抗原(MAGE)-A4是一种癌睾丸抗原,是包括乳腺癌(BC)在内的难治性实体瘤中CAR-T 细胞治疗的一个有前景的靶点。然而,缺乏针对MAGE-A4的高特异性抗体是开发MAGE-A4靶向免疫治疗的主要挑战。本研究旨在验证一种新型MAGE-A4抗体(E701U)的特异性,并检测MAGE-A4在临床BC样本中的表达。将MAGE-A1、-A2B、-A3、-A4、-A6、-A9、-A10和-A12基因转染至HEK293细胞中。使用E701U抗体评估每个插入细胞块中MAGE-A4的表达。随后,我们使用E701U通过免疫组织化学评估了403例原发性BC组织样本中MAGE-A4的表达,并分析了MAGE-A4在早期BC患者中的临床影响。结果显示,MAGE-A4表达仅限于转导了MAGE-A4基因的细胞。在5.7%的BC样本中观察到MAGE-A4表达。三阴性BC中的阳性率显著高于其他亚型。MAGE-A4(+)患者的5年总生存率显著低于MAGE-A4(-) BC患者。此外,MAGE-A4(+) BC患者的5年无复发生存(RFS)率显著低于MAGE-A4(-) BC患者。MAGE-A4表达是RFS的独立预后因素。总之,E701U抗体在MAGE家族基因中对MAGE-A4表达显示出可靠的特异性。MAGE-A4(+) BC患者预后不良,是MAGE-A4特异性免疫治疗的潜在候选人群。
Melanoma-associated antigen (MAGE)-A4, a cancer testis antigen, presents a promising target for chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in refractory solid tumors, including breast cancer (BC). However, the lack of highly specific Abs against MAGE-A4 is a major challenge for the development of MAGE-A4-targeted immunotherapies. This study aimed to validate the specificity of a novel MAGE-A4 Ab (E701U) and examine MAGE-A4 expression in clinical BC samples. MAGE-A1, -A2B, -A3, -A4, -A6, -A9, -A10, and -A12 genes were transfected into HEK293 cells. MAGE-A4 expression in each inserted cell block was evaluated using an E701U Ab. Subsequently, we evaluated MAGE-A4 expression in 403 primary BC tissue samples by immunohistochemistry using E701U and analyzed the clinical impact of MAGE-A4 in patients with early BC. The results showed that MAGE-A4 expression was limited to cells transduced with the MAGE-A4 gene. MAGE-A4 expression was observed in 5.7% of the BC samples. Positivity in triple-negative BC was significantly higher than in the other subtypes. The 5-year overall survival rate of patients with MAGE-A4(+) was significantly worse than those with MAGE-A4(-) BC. Moreover, the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate of patients with MAGE-A4(+) BC was significantly lower than that of patients with MAGE-A4(-) BC. MAGE-A4 expression was an independent prognostic factor for RFS. In conclusion, the E701U Ab showed reliable specificity for MAGE-A4 expression among MAGE family genes. Patients with MAGE-A4(+) BC have an unfavorable prognosis and represent potential candidates for MAGE-A4-specific immunotherapy.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。