← 返回

与接受异基因和自体干细胞移植患者进行的健康相关价值观讨论:早期初级姑息治疗干预的可行性和可接受性

英文原题:Health-Related Values Discussions with Patients Undergoing Allogeneic and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant: Feasibility and Acceptability of an Early Primary Palliative Care Intervention.

查看英文原题

Health-Related Values Discussions with Patients Undergoing Allogeneic and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant: Feasibility and Acceptability of an Early Primary Palliative Care Intervention.

PubMed 2024/12/17(内容时间) Transplant Cell Ther Q1 · IF 4.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在这项初步研究中,将患者的 HRVs 讨论纳入常规 HSCT 护理被证明是可行且可接受的。

中文摘要

造血干细胞移植(HSCT)具有治愈潜力,但发病率和死亡率也相对较高。患者在整个移植过程中存在多维度的姑息治疗(PC)需求。然而,血液系统恶性肿瘤患者通常不会常规接受PC。国家指南建议,在进行包括HSCT在内的血液系统疾病治愈性治疗时同步提供PC。

本研究旨在确定,对于接受HSCT的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者,早期并持续讨论其核心健康相关价值观(HRV)是否可行且易于接受。 研究设计:我们设计并实施了一项试点研究,评估移植团队使用简短、结构化的指南(含8个开放式问题)帮助患者表达其HRV的情况。2021年3月至2022年3月期间,在两家门诊HSCT诊所接受移植的所有英语患者均符合条件,并获邀参加。计划在移植前以及移植后5个时间点(第10–14天、第30天、第100天、6个月和1年)讨论HRV。通过调查临床人员和患者,评估这一主要PC干预措施的可行性和可接受性。

共有31名患者参与了149次价值观讨论,其中大多为男性(61%)和白人(68%),所患疾病为浆细胞疾病(58%)或髓系疾病(42%)。首次讨论平均耗时17.7分钟,后续讨论平均耗时13.3分钟。大多数患者表示,他们乐于讨论自身价值观,认为讨论重要且有帮助,也有益于照护者。患者表示,讨论后感到照护团队倾听并理解了自己。临床人员也乐于开展这些讨论,认为讨论有益,并表示由此了解到患者诊断之外的新信息。

这项试点研究发现,将患者HRV讨论纳入常规HSCT照护是可行且易于接受的。患者和医务人员的反馈总体积极。根据这些结果,该项目已经过完善并扩展至所有接受HSCT和CAR-T 细胞治疗的患者,研究团队计划进一步评估这一方法的临床影响。

展开英文摘要原文

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) has curative potential but also relatively high morbidity and mortality. Patients have multidimensional palliative care (PC) needs throughout the transplant process. However, PC is not routinely offered to patients with hematologic malignancies. National guidelines recommend PC concurrent with curative hematologic disease treatment, including HSCT.

Our goal was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of incorporating early and ongoing discussions of patients' core health-related values (HRVs) for patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing HSCT. STUDY DESIGN: We designed and implemented a pilot study evaluating the transplant team's use of a brief, structured guide with eight open-ended questions to support patients' articulation of their HRVs. All English-speaking patients undergoing HSCT from March 2021 to March 2022 in two outpatient HSCT clinics were eligible and offered enrollment. HRV discussions were planned pretransplant, and then at 5 time points post-transplant (Day 10-14, Day 30, Day 100, 6 months, 1 year). Clinicians and patients were surveyed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of this primary PC intervention.

31 patients, mostly male (61%) and white (68%), with plasma cell (58%) and myeloid (42%) diseases participated in 149 values discussions. Initial discussions averaged 17.7 minutes; subsequent discussions were 13.3 minutes. Most patients were comfortable discussing their values and indicated it was important and helpful for them, as well as beneficial for their caregivers. Patients reported feeling heard and understood by their care team following values discussions. Clinicians were comfortable having the discussions, felt they were beneficial, and indicated learning new information about their patients beyond their diagnosis.

Incorporating discussions of patients' HRVs into routine HSCT care was found to be feasible and acceptable in this pilot study. Feedback from patients and providers was overwhelmingly positive. Based on these results, the program has been refined and expanded to include all patients receiving HSCT and chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy, with plans to study the clinical impact of this approach.

论文信息

作者
Cohen AG、Cho C、Patterson E、Magaldi J、Doga T、Naputo K、Alvarez K、Giles E
单位
Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: cohena2@mskcc.org.United States
期刊
Transplantation and cellular therapy2025 Feb
原文标识
PubMed 39701287 · DOI 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.12.009