← 返回

早期免疫效应细胞相关血液毒性预测模型的开发与验证

英文原题:Development and validation of predictive models of early immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity.

查看英文原题

Development and validation of predictive models of early immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity.

PubMed 2025/02/11(内容时间) Blood Adv Q1 · IF 7.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

免疫效应细胞相关血液学毒性(ICAHT)与嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗后的发病率和死亡率相关。目前与ICAHT相关的因素尚未得到充分描述,也没有依据现行共识标准验证的ICAHT预测模型。

因此,我们对691例接受商业化或研究性CAR-T 细胞治疗的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者开展全面单变量分析,以识别与严重(3–4级)早期ICAHT(eICAHT)相关的因素。单变量逻辑回归显示,输注前与严重eICAHT相关的因素包括疾病类型(急性淋巴细胞白血病)、淋巴细胞清除前(pre-LD)的血液指标(包括绝对中性粒细胞计数[ANC])、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)及炎症标志物(C反应蛋白[CRP]、铁蛋白和白细胞介素6[IL-6]),以及凝血异常标志物D-二聚体。输注后与严重eICAHT相关的实验室指标包括炎症标志物(CRP、铁蛋白和IL-6)早期及峰值水平、D-二聚体、细胞因子释放综合征峰值等级以及神经毒性峰值等级。

研究分别使用483例患者训练并用208例患者验证两种eICAHT预测模型(eIPM):仅含输注前因素的eIPMPre(疾病类型、pre-LD ANC、血小板计数、LDH和铁蛋白),以及含输注前因素(疾病类型、pre-LD ANC、血小板计数和LDH)及早期输注后因素(第+3天铁蛋白)的eIPMPost。两个模型的预测均经过校准且区分度较高(测试集受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.87和0.88),其中eIPMPost在决策曲线分析中净获益更高。可使用在线工具(https://eipm.fredhutch.org)通过两种eIPM生成严重eICAHT个体化预测。

展开英文摘要原文

Immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT) is associated with morbidity and mortality after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. To date, the factors associated with ICAHT are poorly characterized, and there is no validated predictive model of ICAHT as defined by current consensus criteria.

Therefore, we performed comprehensive univariate analyses to identify factors associated with severe (grade 3-4) early ICAHT (eICAHT) in 691 patients who received commercial or investigational CAR T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies. In univariate logistic regression, preinfusion factors associated with severe eICAHT included disease type (acute lymphoblastic leukemia), prelymphodepletion (pre-LD) blood counts including absolute neutrophil count (ANC), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and inflammatory (C-reactive protein [CRP], ferritin, and interleukin-6 [IL-6]) and coagulopathy biomarkers (D-dimer).

Postinfusion laboratory markers associated with severe eICAHT included early and peak levels of inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, ferritin, and IL-6), coagulopathy biomarkers (D-dimer), peak cytokine release syndrome grade, and peak neurotoxicity grade.

We trained (n = 483) and validated (n = 208) 2 eICAHT prediction models (eIPMs): eIPMPre including preinfusion factors only (disease type and pre-LD ANC, platelet count, LDH, and ferritin) and eIPMPost containing both preinfusion (disease type and pre-LD ANC, platelet count, and LDH) and early postinfusion (day +3 ferritin) factors.

Both models generated calibrated predictions and high discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in test set, 0. 87 for eIPMPre and 0. 88 for eIPMPost), with higher net benefit in decision curve analysis for eIPMPost. Individualized predictions of severe eICAHT can be generated from both eIPMs using our online tool (available at https://eipm. fredhutch. org).

论文信息

作者
Liang EC、Huang JJ、Portuguese AJ、Ortiz-Maldonado V、Albittar A、Wuliji N、Basom R、Jeon Y
单位
Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.United States
文献类型
验证性研究
期刊
Blood advances2025 Feb 11
原文标识
PubMed 39626349 · DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014455