CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Impact of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant on Safety and Outcomes of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Therapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM).
Impact of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant on Safety and Outcomes of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Therapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM).
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
尽管异基因干细胞移植(allo-SCT)可通过移植物抗骨髓瘤效应带来长期生存甚至治愈多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的可能性,但其应用仍有限,主要顾虑是感染和移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)等严重并发症。既往接受allo-SCT的患者再接受CAR-T 治疗,是否可能加重GVHD,仍是一个令人关注的问题。西达基奥仑赛(Cilta-cel)和伊德卡布他仑赛(Ide-cel)是已获FDA批准、用于治疗复发/难治性(R/R)MM的CAR-T 疗法。近期对CARTITUDE-1试验数据的研究显示,既往接受过allo-SCT的患者使用Cilta-cel具有令人鼓舞的安全性和疗效。本报告介绍我们在此类患者中开展CAR-T 治疗的真实世界经验。本研究旨在评估既往接受allo-SCT的R/R MM患者接受CAR-T 治疗的安全性和疗效。
我们对在机构审查委员会(IRB)批准方案下接受CAR-T 治疗的成年R/R MM患者(18至70岁)进行回顾性分析。安全性和疗效结局数据取自机构记录。不良事件(AE)按美国国家癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准(NCI-CTCAE)5.0版评估。细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)按美国移植与细胞治疗学会(ASTCT)标准分级。疗效指标包括总缓解率(ORR)和无进展生存期(PFS),采用Kaplan-Meier法分析;PFS定义为CAR-T 治疗开始至疾病进展或死亡的时间。
接受CAR-T 治疗的56例患者中,8例(14.3%)既往接受过allo-SCT。与未接受allo-SCT组相比,这些患者既往治疗线数中位数为7线,而非allo-SCT组为5线(p=0.04)。从allo-SCT至CAR-T 输注的中位间隔为98.8个月,范围为57.9至178.5个月。allo-SCT组CRS发生率为87.5%,未接受allo-SCT组为77.1%(p=0.48)。allo-SCT组有1例患者发生噬血细胞性淋巴组织细胞增多症(HLH),需接受阿那白滞素治疗。中位随访4.8个月时,allo-SCT组ORR为87.5%,未接受allo-SCT组为75%(p=0.4)。分析时allo-SCT组尚未达到PFS中位数,未接受allo-SCT组为11.9个月(p=0.5)。allo-SCT队列未观察到治疗相关死亡或急性GVHD。
本研究提示,既往allo-SCT不会对R/R MM患者接受CAR-T 治疗的安全性或疗效产生不利影响。这些发现表明,需要在更大样本和更长随访中进一步研究,以更好地理解allo-SCT与CAR-T 治疗之间的相互作用。
Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has seen limited use in treating multiple myeloma (MM), despite its potential to offer long-term survival or even cure through the graft-versus-myeloma effect. Its limited application is largely due to concerns over serious complications like infections and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The possibility of GVHD exacerbation when CAR-T cells are administered to patients previously treated with allo-SCT remains a topic of concern. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta-cel) and idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) are CAR-T therapies that have been FDA-approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM. A recent study using data from the CARTITUDE-1 trial has shown promising safety and efficacy of Cilta-Cel in patients with a prior history of allo-SCT. This report outlines our real-world experience with CAR-T treatment in such patients. The objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of CAR-T therapy in R/R MM patients who have previously undergone allo-SCT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients (18-70 years old) with R/R MM treated with CAR-T therapy as part of an institutional IRB-approved protocol. Data were collected on safety and efficacy outcomes from the institution's records. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5. 0.
Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded based on American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) criteria. Efficacy metrics included overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), analyzed through the Kaplan-Meier method, with PFS defined as the time from CAR-T initiation to disease progression or death. Results: Of the 56 patients treated with CAR-T therapy, 8 (14. 3%) had previously undergone allo-SCT. These patients had a median of seven prior therapy lines (LOTs), compared to five LOTs in the non-allo-SCT group ( p = 0. 04). CAR-T infusion occurred a median of 98. 8 months after allo-SCT, with a range from 57.
9 months to 178. 5 months. CRS occurred in 87. 5% of the allo-SCT group versus 77. 1% in the non-allo-SCT group ( p = 0. 48). One patient in the allo-SCT group developed hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), requiring anakinra. At a median follow-up of 4. 8 months, the ORR was 87. 5% in the allo-SCT group versus 75% in the non-allo-SCT group ( p = 0. 4).
Median PFS had not been reached for the allo-SCT group at the time of analysis compared to 11. 9 months in the non-allo-SCT group ( p = 0. 5). No treatment-related mortality or acute GVHD was noted in the allo-SCT cohort. Conclusions: The study suggests that prior allo-SCT does not adversely affect the safety or efficacy of CAR-T therapy in patients with R/R MM.
These findings highlight the need for further investigations with larger patient samples and longer follow-up to better understand the interaction between allo-SCT and CAR-T therapy.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。