← 返回

探索运动训练对新辅助化疗后乳腺癌病理反应与肿瘤免疫微环境的影响

英文原题:Exploring the effect of exercise training on breast cancer's pathologic response and tumor immune microenvironment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

查看英文原题

Exploring the effect of exercise training on breast cancer's pathologic response and tumor immune microenvironment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PubMed 2024/10/21(内容时间) Support Care Cancer Q1 · IF 3.4(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在 pCR 和 TILs 方面,组内与组间均未发现差异,这可能与该分析的探索性性质有关。

中文摘要

新辅助化疗(NAC)后的病理完全缓解(pCR)和TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)比例,是早期乳腺癌(BC)已确立的预后生物标志物。运动训练在整个 BC 诊疗过程中可作为有效支持性照护,但其对 NAC 疗效的影响未知。本研究旨在评估监督式运动训练计划(SETP)对接受 NAC 女性 BC 患者 pCR 和 TIL 的影响。

对一项临床试验中接受 NAC、并随机分配至 SETP 或对照组的 BC 患者亚组进行回顾性探索分析。终点包括 pCR、活检 TIL 和间质 TIL。

共纳入 64 名参与者,平均年龄 50.3 ± 10.1 岁;多数为 II 或 III 期疾病(n = 58,90.6%),肿瘤为 HER2 阳性(n = 23,35.9%)或三阴性(n = 19,29.7%)。SETP 组和对照组 pCR 率分别为 56.7% 和 55.9%(p = 0.950)。SETP 组活检和肿瘤部位 TIL 中位数分别为 5.0(0.0–80.0)和 5.0(5.0–30.0);对照组分别为 5.0(0.0–90.0)和 0.0(0.0–30.0)。两组活检和肿瘤部位 TIL 差异分别为 0.04(95% 置信区间 [CI] −13.6 至 13.7;p = 0.995)和 −4.3(95% CI −11.5 至 2.9;p = 0.233)。两组活检 TIL 未见统计学显著差异,但 SETP 组肿瘤部位 TIL 水平略高。

组内和组间 pCR 与 TIL 均未见差异,可能与探索性分析性质有关。未来仍需开展统计效能充分的研究。

展开英文摘要原文

Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the percentage of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are established prognostic biomarkers in early breast cancer (BC). While exercise training is effective as supportive care throughout the BC journey, its impact on the efficacy of NAC is unknown. This study aims to investigate the influence of a supervised exercise training program (SETP) on pCR and TILs in BC women undergoing NAC.

Retrospective exploratory analysis of the subgroup of BC patients treated with NAC included in a clinical trial randomizing to STEP and control arm. Endpoints were pCR, biopsy, and stromal TILs.

Sixty-four participants were included, with a mean age of 50.3 10.1 years, predominantly stage II and III disease (n = 58, 90.6%), HER2 + (n = 23, 35.9%), or triple-negative (n = 19, 29.7%) tumors. pCR was achieved in 56.7% and 55.9% in the STEP and control arm (p = 0.950). In the STEP arm, median TILs were 5.0 (0.0-80.0) and 5.0 (5.0-30.0), while in the control arm, 5.0 (0.0-90.0) and 0.0 (0.0-30.0) for biopsy and tumor site, respectively. The difference in TILs between arms was 0.04 (confidence interval (CI 95%) - 13.6, 13.7; p = 0.995) and - 4.3 (CI 95% - 11.5, 2.9; (p = 0.233) for biopsy and tumor site, respectively. No statistically significant difference was discerned between the groups concerning TILs of the biopsy. However, a marginally higher TIL level at the tumor site was associated with the SETP arm.

No differences were discerned within and between groups on both pCR and TILs, in possible relation to the exploratory nature of the analysis. Future adequately powered research is warranted.

论文信息

作者
Guedes H、João D、Caldas M、Antunes P、Costa T、Alves A、Helguero L、Joaquim A
单位
Medical Oncology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia E Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal. helenaguedes16@hotmail.com.Portugal
文献类型
随机对照试验
期刊
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024 Oct 21
原文标识
PubMed 39432116 · DOI 10.1007/s00520-024-08942-0