CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:EASIX and m-EASIX predict CRS and ICANS in pediatric and AYA patients after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy.
EASIX and m-EASIX predict CRS and ICANS in pediatric and AYA patients after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)是CD19靶向嵌合抗原受体(CD19-CAR)T细胞治疗的并发症。内皮激活和应激指数(EASIX)及改良EASIX(m-EASIX)评分已在回顾性研究中被证明可预测成人CAR-T 细胞接受者的CRS和ICANS。
然而,这些评分尚未在儿科队列中评估。我们回顾性报告了在St. Jude儿童研究医院或Johns Hopkins医院接受CD19-CAR-T 细胞治疗的76例复发/难治性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病儿童及青少年和年轻成人(AYA)患者。数据包括患者、疾病和治疗特征。EASIX和m-EASIX评分在CAR-T 细胞输注前第-5天、第0天和输注后第+3天计算。CRS和ICANS分别发生于47例和17例患者。在所有评估时间点,发生重度CRS和任何级别ICANS的患者中位EASIX评分较高,而发生重度CRS和重度ICANS的患者中位m-EASIX评分高于无/轻度CRS/ICANS患者。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,两个评分在所有时间点均是CRS的有力预测因子,尤其是重度CRS。任何级别和重度ICANS在第+3天由两个评分预测最佳。除预测任何级别ICANS外,m-EASIX一致优于EASIX。
我们的结果验证了EASIX和m-EASIX评分在预测儿童和AYA患者CAR-T 细胞相关并发症方面的潜在效用。
Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are complications of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CD19-CAR) T-cell therapy. The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) and modified EASIX (m-EASIX) scores have been retrospectively proven to be predictive of CRS and ICANS in adult CAR T-cell recipients.
However, these scores have not been evaluated in pediatric cohorts.
We retrospectively report on 76 pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with CD19-CAR T cells at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital or Johns Hopkins Hospital. Data included patient, disease, and treatment characteristics. EASIX and m-EASIX scores were calculated at days -5 before, 0, and +3 after CAR T-cell infusion. CRS and ICANS occurred in 47 and 17 patients, respectively.
At all evaluated time points, the median EASIX scores were higher for patients who developed severe CRS and any grade ICANS, and the median m-EASIX scores were higher in patients who developed severe CRS and severe ICANS than those with no/mild CRS/ICANS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that both scores were strong predictors of CRS, especially severe CRS, at all time points. Any grade and severe ICANS were best predicted by both scores at day +3. m-EASIX uniformly outperformed EASIX, except for predicting any grade ICANS.
Our results validate the potential utility of EASIX and m-EASIX scores for predicting CAR T-cell-related complications for pediatric and AYA patients.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。