免疫检查点阻断通过扩增效应 CD8⁺ T 细胞克隆增强淋巴细胞清除性化疗诱导的抗肿瘤免疫
Immune Checkpoint Blockade Augments Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy-Induced Antitumor Immunity by Expanding Effector CD8+ T-cell Clones.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Tumor lysate particle only vaccine (TLPO) vs. Tumor lysate particle-loaded, dendritic cell vaccine (TLPLDC) to prevent recurrence in resected stage III/IV melanoma patients: Results of a phase I/IIa trial.
Tumor lysate particle only vaccine (TLPO) vs. Tumor lysate particle-loaded, dendritic cell vaccine (TLPLDC) to prevent recurrence in resected stage III/IV melanoma patients: Results of a phase I/IIa trial.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
在一项随机、双盲的 I/IIa 期试验中,接受辅助 TLPO 疫苗与 TLPLDC 疫苗的已切除 III/IV 期黑色素瘤患者在 DFS 或 OS 方面没有差异。鉴于生产优势,有必要在 III 期试验中对 TLPO 进行进一步的疗效测试。
自体肿瘤裂解物、颗粒负载的树突状细胞(TLPLDC)疫苗由在体外负载自体肿瘤裂解物(TL)的树突状细胞(DC)制备而成。TLPLDC 已在 IIb 期试验中显示可减少已切除 III/IV 期黑色素瘤患者的复发。仅 TL 颗粒(TLPO)疫苗通过将酵母细胞壁颗粒负载自体 TL 并直接注射制备,从而实现体内 DC 负载。我们在 TLPLDC 疫苗更大规模 IIb 期试验中嵌入的 I/IIa 期试验中比较了 TLPO 和 TLPLDC 疫苗。
术后达到临床无病状态的患者按2:1随机分配接受TLPO或TLPLDC疫苗,并随访复发和死亡情况。患者在入组后0、1、2、6、12和18个月按计划接受皮内接种。采用Kaplan-Meier和log-rank分析在意向治疗(ITT)分析中比较无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。
63例患者被随机分配,43例接受TLPO,20例接受TLPLDC。随机分配至TLPO组的患者更可能为女性(37.2% vs. 10.0%,p = 0.026),但除此之外未发现显著的临床病理学差异。两个治疗组之间未发现相关不良事件(AE)的差异。在中位随访20.5个月时,TLPO组和TLPLDC组的DFS(60.8% vs. 58.7%,p = 0.714)和OS(94.6% vs. 93.8%,p = 0.966)分别相当。在亚组分析中,未发现疫苗类型之间的统计学差异,该分析考虑了是否接受免疫治疗以及采血前是否使用G-CSF。
The autologous tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine is produced from dendritic cells (DC) loaded ex vivo with autologous tumor lysate (TL). TLPLDC has been shown to decrease recurrence in resected Stage III/IV melanoma patients in a Phase IIb trial. The TL particle only (TLPO) vaccine is produced by loading of yeast cell wall particles with autologous TL and direct injection allowing for in vivo DC loading. We have compared the TLPO and TLPLDC vaccines in an embedded Phase I/IIa trial of a larger Phase IIb trial of the TLPLDC vaccine.
Patients rendered clinically disease-free after surgery were randomized 2:1 to receive the TLPO or TLPLDC vaccine and followed for recurrence and death. Patients had scheduled intradermal inoculations at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 18 months after enrollment. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were used to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis.
Sixty-three patients were randomized, 43 TLPO and 20 TLPLDC. Patients randomized to the TLPO arm were more likely to be female (37.2% vs. 10.0 %, p = 0.026), but otherwise no significant clinicopathological differences were identified. No differences in related adverse events (AE) were found between treatment arms. At a median follow-up of 20.5 months, the DFS (60.8% vs. 58.7 %, p = 0.714) and OS (94.6% vs. 93.8 %, p = 0.966) were equivalent between the TLPO and TLPLDC groups, respectively. No statistical differences were found in subgroup analyses between vaccine types, which accounted for receipt of immunotherapy and the use of G-CSF pre-blood draw.
In a randomized, double-blind Phase I/IIa trial, there were no differences in DFS or OS in resected Stage III/IV melanoma patients receiving adjuvant TLPO versus TLPLDC vaccines. Given manufacturing advantages, further efficacy testing of TLPO is warranted in a Phase III trial.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。