← 返回

abemaciclib 联合内分泌治疗 HR+/HER2- 晚期或转移性乳腺癌的疗效与安全性:系统综述与荟萃分析

英文原题:Efficacy and Safety of Abemaciclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

查看英文原题

Efficacy and Safety of Abemaciclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PubMed 2024/09/09(内容时间) Am J Clin Oncol Q4 · IF 1.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

阿贝西利,尤其是与氟维司群联合,已成为 HR+/HER2- 晚期或转移性乳腺癌的有效治疗选择,可改善 PFS 和 OS。

中文摘要

乳腺癌,尤其是激素受体阳性(HR+)、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2-)亚型,仍是重要的全球健康问题。CDK4/6抑制剂阿贝西利在晚期病例治疗中显示希望。本研究全面评估阿贝西利联合内分泌治疗HR+/HER2-晚期或转移性乳腺癌的疗效与安全性。

根据PRISMA指南开展系统综述和荟萃分析。系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆及ClinicalTrials.gov,检索截至2023年12月。纳入报告获批剂量阿贝西利单药或联合治疗的随机对照试验及回顾性队列研究。评估结局包括无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、副作用/不良事件及总生存期(OS)。采用Cochrane修订版偏倚风险工具和Newcastle-Ottawa量表进行质量评估。

22项研究共14,010例患者的合并结果显示,阿贝西利显著改善PFS(风险比0.53;95%置信区间0.48–0.59;P=0.00;I²=0%)、ORR(风险比2.31;95%置信区间1.93–2.75;P=0.00;I²=0%)和OS(风险比0.76;95%置信区间0.65–0.87;P=0.001;I²=0%)。不过,阿贝西利与氟维司群或非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂联合时,均增加不良事件风险。

阿贝西利,尤其与氟维司群联用,是HR+/HER2-晚期或转移性乳腺癌的有效治疗选择,可改善PFS和OS。其毒性较高,尤其对既往未治疗患者应谨慎使用。

展开英文摘要原文

Breast cancer, particularly the hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) subtype, remains a major global health concern. Abemaciclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, has shown promising results in treating advanced cases. This study comprehensively assesses the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. A thorough literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov til December 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies reporting on abemaciclib in approved doses, either as monotherapy or in combination. Outcome assessments included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), side effects/adverse effects (SE/AE), and overall survival (OS). Quality assessment utilized Cochrane's revised risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

Pooled results of 22 studies involving 14,010 patients revealed that abemaciclib significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio=0.53; 95% CI: 0.48-0.59; P =0.00; I 2 =0%), ORR (risk ratio=2.31; 95% CI: 1.93-2.75; P =0.00; I 2 =0%), and OS (risk ratio=0.76 (95% CI: 0.65-0.87; P =0.001; I 2 =0%). However, abemaciclib increased the risk of adverse events in the fulvestrant and nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) combinations, respectively.

Abemaciclib, particularly in combination with fulvestrant, emerges as an effective therapeutic option for HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer, improving PFS and OS. The higher toxicity profile warrants cautious use, especially in treatment-naive patients.

论文信息

作者
Qureshi Z、Jamil A、Fatima E、Altaf F、Siddique R
第一作者单位
The Frank H. Netter M.D. School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, Bridgeport, CT.
通讯作者单位
Independent Research Associate, Watertown, NY.
文献类型
系统综述 · 荟萃分析
期刊
American journal of clinical oncology2025 Jan 1
原文标识
PubMed 39249111 · DOI 10.1097/COC.0000000000001143