CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Hematological Malignancies Post-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Phase 2 and Phase 3 Clinical Trials.
Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Hematological Malignancies Post-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Phase 2 and Phase 3 Clinical Trials.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CAR-T 细胞疗法使用具有特异性结合位点的基因工程T细胞。该疗法为血液系统恶性肿瘤患者提供了肿瘤特异性和持久的治疗反应。在本综述中,我们研究了与CAR-T 疗法相关的静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)风险。
我们检索了美国国立卫生研究院图书馆、Cochrane图书馆数据库、ClinicalTrials.gov数据库以及医学文献搜索引擎PubMed和Google Scholar,以寻找2期和3期药物疗效与安全性试验,从而确定接受CAR-T 治疗时VTE的总发生率和风险。在1127条检索结果中,共识别出9项研究并纳入我们的meta分析。在接受治疗的1017例患者中,805例患者(79.15%)出现了某种程度的CRS,122例患者(11.9%)出现了重度CRS(高于3级)。在1017例患者中,仅报告3例发生了静脉血栓栓塞症。
我们的研究未发现VTE发生率增加(OR = 0.0005,95% CI [0.0001, 0.0017])与CRS/ICANS之间存在统计学显著关联(p < 0.0001)。VTE的相对风险为0.0050(95%置信区间[0.0019, 0.0132])。在我们的研究中,尽管CRS和基础恶性肿瘤均与VTE风险增加相关,但我们未发现发生VTE的风险有统计学显著增加。
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy uses genetically engineered T-cells with specific binding sites. This therapy allows for tumor specificity and durable treatment responses for patients with hematological malignancies. In this review, we study the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with CAR-T therapy.
We searched the National Institutes of Health library, Cochrane Library Databases, ClinicalTrials. gov database, and medical literature search engines PubMed and Google Scholar for Phase 2 and Phase 3 drug-efficacy and safety trials to determine the aggregate incidence and risk of VTE treated with CAR-T.
Of 1127 search results, nine studies were identified and included in our meta-analysis. Of the 1017 patients who received therapy, 805 patients (79. 15%) experienced some degree of CRS, and 122 patients (11. 9%) experienced severe CRS (higher than grade 3). Only three out of one thousand and seventeen patients were reported to have experienced venous thromboembolism.
Our study did not find a statistically significant association between increased VTE incidence (OR = 0. 0005, 95% CI [0. 0001, 0. 0017]) and CRS/ICANS ( p < 0. 0001). There was a 0. 0050 (95% confidence interval [0. 0019, 0. 0132]) relative risk for VTE. In our study, we did not find a statistically significantly increased risk of developing VTE despite CRS and underlying malignancy, which have been associated with increased risk of VTE.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。