← 返回

HER2 阳性乳腺癌患者新辅助治疗后的预后因素:预测列线图的开发与验证

英文原题:Prognostic factors of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: Development and validation of a predictive nomogram.

查看英文原题

Prognostic factors of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: Development and validation of a predictive nomogram.

PubMed 2024/07/31(内容时间) Pathol Res Pract Q1 · IF 3.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

列线图预测模型能准确预测 post-NAT 乳腺癌患者的预后状况,且比临床分期和 RCB 分级更准确。因此,它可作为选择乳腺癌临床治疗措施的可靠指导。

研究思路结论见上方概要

人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阳性乳腺癌表现出侵袭性表型和不良预后。新辅助治疗(NAT)在乳腺癌患者中的应用可显著降低疾病复发风险并改善生存。通过整合不同的临床病理因素,列线图是预后预测的宝贵工具。本研究旨在评估临床病理因素在HER2阳性乳腺癌患者中的预后价值,并构建用于结局预测的列线图。

我们回顾性分析了2009年1月至2017年12月期间河北医科大学第四医院收治的374例乳腺癌患者的临床病理资料,这些患者经术前空芯针穿刺活检病理诊断为浸润性乳腺癌,接受NAT后行手术切除,且为HER2阳性。患者按7:3的比例随机分为训练集和验证集。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险回归模型进行单因素和多因素生存分析。多因素分析结果用于构建预测3年、5年和8年总生存期(OS)率的列线图。绘制校准曲线以检验预测风险与实际风险之间的一致性。采用Harrell C指数和时间依赖性受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估列线图预测模型的区分度。

所有纳入的患者均为女性,平均年龄为50 ± 10.4岁(范围:26-72岁)。在训练集中,单因素和多因素分析均确定残留癌症负荷(RCB)分级、TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs)和临床分期是OS的独立预后因素,并将这些因素结合起来构建列线图。校准曲线显示预测风险与实际风险之间具有良好的一致性,列线图的C-index为0.882(95 % CI 0.863-0.901)。3年、5年和8年的ROC曲线下面积(AUCs)分别为0.909、0.893和0.918,表明列线图具有良好的准确性。校准曲线在验证集中也显示出良好的一致性,C-index为0.850(95 % CI 0.804-0.896),3年、5年和8年的AUCs分别为0.909、0.815和0.834,这也表明具有良好的准确性。

展开英文摘要原文

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer exhibits an aggressive phenotype and poor prognosis. The application of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with breast cancer can significantly reduce the risks of disease recurrence and improve survival. By integrating different clinicopathological factors, nomograms are valuable tools for prognosis prediction. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of clinicopathological factors in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and construct a nomogram for outcome prediction.

We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological data from 374 patients with breast cancer admitted to the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 2009 and December 2017, who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer through preoperative core needle biopsy pathology, underwent surgical resection after NAT, and were HER2-positive. Patients were randomly divided into a training and validation set at a ratio of 7:3. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results of the multivariate analysis were used to create nomograms predicting 3-, 5-, and 8-year overall survival (OS) rates. Calibration curves were plotted to test concordance between the predicted and actual risks. Harrell C-index and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the discriminability of the nomogram prediction model.

All included patients were women, with a mean age of 50 ± 10.4 years (range: 26-72 years). In the training set, both univariate and multivariate analyses identified residual cancer burden (RCB) class, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes(TILs), and clinical stage as independent prognostic factors for OS, and these factors were combined to construct a nomogram. The calibration curves demonstrated good concordance between the predicted and actual risks, and the C-index of the nomogram was 0.882 (95 % CI 0.863-0.901). The 3-, 5-, and 8-year areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were 0.909, 0.893, and 0.918, respectively, indicating good accuracy of the nomogram. The calibration curves also demonstrated good concordance in the validation set, with a C-index of 0.850 (95 % CI 0.804-0.896) and 3-, 5-, and 8-year AUCs of 0.909, 0.815, and 0.834, respectively, which also indicated good accuracy.

The nomogram prediction model accurately predicted the prognostic status of post-NAT patients with breast cancer and was more accurate than clinical stage and RCB class. Therefore, it can serve as a reliable guide for selecting clinical treatment measures for breast cancer.

论文信息

作者
Jia Z、Xing H、Wang J、Wang X、Wang X、Liu C、He J、Wu S
第一作者单位
Department of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, China.China
通讯作者单位
Department of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, China. Electronic address: annama@163.com.China
文献类型
验证性研究
期刊
Pathology, research and practice2024 Sep
原文标识
PubMed 39116570 · DOI 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155504