RNF43 p.G659fs 通过 PI3K/AKT/mTOR 信号通路和 HLA-E 上调导致 MSI-high 结直肠癌中 NK 细胞功能障碍
RNF43 p.G659fs leads to natural killer cell dysfunction in MSI-high colorectal cancer through PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling and HLA-E up-regulation.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Extracellular vesicles at the crossroad between cancer progression and immunotherapy: focus on dendritic cells.
Extracellular vesicles at the crossroad between cancer progression and immunotherapy: focus on dendritic cells.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
细胞外囊泡(EV)是纳米级、耐热囊泡,几乎由体内所有细胞释放,包括肿瘤细胞和肿瘤浸润树突状细胞(DC)。EV携带来源细胞的分子,在稳态和癌症中充当细胞间通讯媒介,也可能成为有价值的治疗及诊断工具。本综述聚焦肿瘤来源EV(TEV)对DC功能的调节作用,以及肿瘤和DC来源EV在免疫治疗和DC疫苗设计中的治疗潜力。TEV最初因能够将肿瘤抗原转移给DC而受到关注,但目前主要被视为免疫抑制性,因为其表达PD-L1、HLA-G、PGE2等抑制DC的分子。
不过,通过适当工程改造减少其免疫抑制性载荷或增强免疫原性,TEV仍可能成为向DC递送抗原物质的优选系统。与肿瘤来源EV相比,DC来源EV更具前景:其表面有负载抗原的MHC、共刺激分子和激活NK细胞的配体,且不携带免疫抑制性物质。与细胞类药物相比,DC来源EV还具有抗原/MHC浓度更高、易于操作、对免疫抑制性微环境敏感性更低等优势。临床前模型显示,DC来源EV可直接或通过将抗原转移给肿瘤浸润DC, 有效激活肿瘤特异性NK和T细胞反应。相比之下,I期和II期临床试验显示EV抗癌疫苗的临床疗效有限。本文讨论了EV疗法未来发展所需克服的主要挑战,包括对其生物学及药代动力学理解仍不完整,以及缺乏标准化的高通量分离纯化方法。尽管如此,EV仍是癌症免疫治疗领域的重要候选方案,未来可能在某些方面超过细胞治疗策略。
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanosized heat-stable vesicles released by virtually all cells in the body, including tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells (DCs). By carrying molecules from originating cells, EVs work as cell-to-cell communicators in both homeostasis and cancer but may also represent valuable therapeutic and diagnostic tools.
This review focuses on the role of tumor-derived EVs (TEVs) in the modulation of DC functions and on the therapeutic potential of both tumor- and DC-derived EVs in the context of immunotherapy and DC-based vaccine design. TEVs were originally characterized for their capability to transfer tumor antigens to DCs but are currently regarded as mainly immunosuppressive because of the expression of DC-inhibiting molecules such as PD-L1, HLA-G, PGE2 and others.
However, TEVs may still represent a privileged system to deliver antigenic material to DCs upon appropriate engineering to reduce their immunosuppressive cargo or increase immunogenicity. DC-derived EVs are more promising than tumor-derived EVs since they expose antigen-loaded MHC, costimulatory molecules and NK cell-activating ligands in the absence of an immunosuppressive cargo.
Moreover, DC-derived EVs possess several advantages as compared to cell-based drugs such as a higher antigen/MHC concentration and ease of manipulation and a lower sensitivity to immunosuppressive microenvironments. Preclinical models showed that DC-derived EVs efficiently activate tumor-specific NK and T cell responses either directly or indirectly by transferring antigens to tumor-infiltrating DCs. By contrast, however, phase I and II trials showed a limited clinical efficacy of EV-based anticancer vaccines.
We discuss that the future of EV-based therapy depends on our capability to overcome major challenges such as a still incomplete understanding of their biology and pharmacokinetic and the lack of standardized methods for high-throughput isolation and purification. Despite this, EVs remain in the limelight as candidates for cancer immunotherapy which may outmatch cell-based strategies in the fullness of their time.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。