免疫检查点阻断通过扩增效应 CD8⁺ T 细胞克隆增强淋巴细胞清除性化疗诱导的抗肿瘤免疫
Immune Checkpoint Blockade Augments Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy-Induced Antitumor Immunity by Expanding Effector CD8+ T-cell Clones.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Efficacy of TIL therapy in advanced cutaneous melanoma in the current immuno-oncology era: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Efficacy of TIL therapy in advanced cutaneous melanoma in the current immuno-oncology era: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
既往抗 PD-(L)1 治疗对晚期皮肤黑色素瘤患者接受 TIL-ACT 的临床缓解或生存获益没有影响。TIL 治疗在二线治疗中的获益在抗 PD-(L)1 治疗后也同样存在。我们的数据强化了这一证据:对于抗 PD-(L)1 治疗失败的转移性黑色素瘤患者,TIL-ACT 应被视为二线治疗的一种治疗选择。
TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TIL-ACT)过继性细胞疗法在晚期黑色素瘤中持续显示出疗效。该领域的新结果现在提供了评估TIL-ACT后总生存期(OS)以及检查既往抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1/程序性死亡配体1[抗PD-(L)1]治疗对其疗效影响的机会。
在 PubMed 中进行了截至 2024 年 2 月 29 日的全面检索。在这项 meta 分析中,我们聚焦于纳入高剂量 interleukin 2 的研究,患者数量较我们先前截至 2018 年 12 月开展的 meta 分析翻倍,并以 OS 作为主要终点。客观缓解率 (ORR)、完全缓解率 (CRR) 和缓解持续时间是次要终点。研究结果通过表格、Kaplan-Meier 曲线和森林图进行综合。ORR 和 CRR 的合并估计值由固定效应或随机效应模型得出。
这项更新的荟萃分析共纳入13项高剂量白细胞介素2研究,617例患者有OS信息。在接受过抗PD-(L)1治疗的研究{n = 238;17.5个月[95%置信区间(CI)13.8-20.5个月]}与未接受过抗PD-(L)1治疗的研究[n = 379;16.3个月(95% CI 14.2-20.6个月)]之间,中位OS未发现差异(对数秩P = 0.53)。在接受过和未接受过抗PD-(L)1治疗的研究中,ORR估计分别为34%(95% CI 16%-52%)和44%(95% CI 37%-51%)。两组的CRR合并估计值均为10%。两组之间在ORR(P = 0.15)或CRR(P = 0.45)方面均未观察到统计学显著差异。
Adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL-ACT) has consistently shown efficacy in advanced melanoma. New results in the field provide now the opportunity to assess overall survival (OS) after TIL-ACT and to examine the effect of prior anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 [anti-PD-(L)1] therapy on its efficacy.
A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed up to 29 February 2024. n this meta-analysis we focused on studies including high-dose interleukin 2, doubling the patient numbers from our previous meta-analysis conducted up to December 2018 and using OS as the primary endpoint. Objective response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), and duration of response were secondary endpoints. Findings are synthesized using tables, Kaplan-Meier plots, and forest plots. Pooled estimates for ORR and CRR were derived from fixed or random effects models.
A total of 13 high-dose interleukin 2 studies were included in this updated meta-analysis, with OS information available for 617 patients. No difference was found in median OS between studies with prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment {n = 238; 17.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.8-20.5 months]} and without [n = 379; 16.3 months (95% CI 14.2-20.6 months)] (log-rank P = 0.53). ORR was estimated to be 34% (95% CI 16%-52%) and 44% (95% CI 37%-51%), for the studies with and without prior anti-PD-(L)1, respectively. The pooled estimate for CRR was 10% for both groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups, either for ORR (P = 0.15) or CRR (P = 0.45).
Prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment has no effect on the clinical response or survival benefit from TIL-ACT in advanced cutaneous melanoma. The benefit of TIL therapy in the second-line setting is also present after anti-PD-(L)1 treatment. Our data reinforce the evidence that TIL-ACT should be considered as a treatment of choice in second line for metastatic melanoma patients failing anti-PD-(L)1 therapy.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。