CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Early failure is still a poor prognostic factor in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in the era of CAR T-cell therapy.
Early failure is still a poor prognostic factor in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in the era of CAR T-cell therapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
一线化疗难治或早期复发的复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者预后较差。CAR-T 在接受两线及以上化疗后疗效显著,但其在三线治疗中的结局是否相同仍不明确。本回顾性研究纳入107例患者。一线化学免疫治疗后至少12个月才复发者(晚期失败,25例)的总生存期显著长于难治或12个月内复发者(早期失败,82例;中位总生存期未达到 vs 18.4个月)。接受自体造血干细胞移植者中,晚期失败患者无事件生存期也更长;而接受CAR-T 者两组无事件生存期差异未达显著。复发时间与自体移植患者的无事件生存期相关,但在CAR-T 患者中未见显著关联。计划接受CAR-T 者中,晚期失败患者实际接受治疗的比例更高。即使三线CAR-T 获批,早期失败患者的结局仍较差。
Patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) refractory to first-line chemotherapy or with early relapse have poor outcomes. While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has impressive efficacy after two or more lines of chemotherapy, it's still uncertain if these outcomes remain consistent in the context of third-line CAR T-cell therapy.
We conducted a retrospective study of 107 R/R LBCL patients. Patients with relapse 12 months or more after their first-line chemoimmunotherapy (late failure: n = 25) had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than patients with refractory disease or relapse within 12 months (early failure: n = 82) (median OS: not achieved vs.
18. 4 months; P < 0. 001). Among patients who proceeded to autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (auto-HSCT), those with late failure had significantly longer event-free survival (EFS) than those with early failure (median EFS: 26. 9 vs. 3. 1 months; P = 0. 012).
However, no significant difference in EFS was detected among patients who underwent CAR T-cell therapy (median EFS: not reached vs. 11. 8; P = 0. 091). Cox regression with restricted cubic spline demonstrated that timing of relapse had significant impact on EFS in patients with auto-HSCT but not in patients with CAR T-cell therapy. Of patients who were scheduled for CAR T-cell therapy, those with late failure were significantly more likely to receive CAR T-cell therapy than those with early failure (90% vs. 57%; P = 0. 008).
In conclusion, patients with early failure still experienced poor outcomes after the approval of third-line CAR T-cell therapy.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。