CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Evaluating the immunologically "cold" tumor microenvironment after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors utilizing PET imaging of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells in breast cancer mouse models.
Evaluating the immunologically "cold" tumor microenvironment after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors utilizing PET imaging of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells in breast cancer mouse models.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CD4 和 CD8 特异性免疫 PET 显像可用于表征 CD4+和 CD8+T 细胞在免疫检查点阻断应答中的体内分布。描述 CD8+T 细胞和 CD4+T 细胞总体水平及分布的显像指标,有助于深入了解免疫学改变、预测免疫治疗应答的生物标志物,并在应答动力学存在差异的肿瘤中指导临床决策。
使用靶向CD8和颗粒酶B的示踪剂进行免疫正电子发射断层扫描(PET)成像,在预测免疫学“热”肿瘤中免疫检查点阻断(ICB)后的治疗反应方面已显示出前景。然而,在低T细胞浸润的“冷”肿瘤免疫微环境中,ICB期间的免疫动态仍知之甚少。本研究利用分子成像评估乳腺癌模型中ICB期间CD4 + T细胞和CD8 + T细胞的变化,并检查反应生物标志物。
[89Zr]Zr-DFO-CD4和[89Zr]Zr-DFO-CD8放射性示踪剂用于量化4T1和MMTV-HER2小鼠模型中对ICB治疗响应的肿瘤内和脾脏CD4 T细胞及CD8 T细胞的变化,这些模型代表免疫“冷”肿瘤。观察到PET定量指标与长期抗肿瘤响应之间的相关性。通过放射自显影和免疫荧光获得了进一步的生物学验证。
在ICB治疗后,最终对免疫治疗有反应的肿瘤中,CD8特异性PET信号在6天内出现增加,CD4特异性PET信号在2天内出现增加,而在治疗基线时未发现CD4或CD8存在能够区分有反应者与无反应者的显著差异。此外,与无反应者相比,肿瘤对ICB有反应的小鼠脾脏中CD8 PET信号较低,而脾脏中CD4 PET信号较高。与无反应者相比,有反应者中CD8和CD4特异性PET信号的瘤内空间异质性较低。最后,在比较体内成像与离体验证时,PET成像、放射自显影和免疫荧光信号之间存在相关性。
Immune-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with tracers that target CD8 and granzyme B has shown promise in predicting the therapeutic response following immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in immunologically "hot" tumors. However, immune dynamics in the low T-cell infiltrating "cold" tumor immune microenvironment during ICB remain poorly understood. This study uses molecular imaging to evaluate changes in CD4 + T cells and CD8 + T cells during ICB in breast cancer models and examines biomarkers of response.
[ 89 Zr]Zr-DFO-CD4 and [ 89 Zr]Zr-DFO-CD8 radiotracers were used to quantify changes in intratumoral and splenic CD4 T cells and CD8 T cells in response to ICB treatment in 4T1 and MMTV-HER2 mouse models, which represent immunologically "cold" tumors. A correlation between PET quantification metrics and long-term anti-tumor response was observed. Further biological validation was obtained by autoradiography and immunofluorescence.
Following ICB treatment, an increase in the CD8-specific PET signal was observed within 6 days, and an increase in the CD4-specific PET signal was observed within 2 days in tumors that eventually responded to immunotherapy, while no significant differences in CD4 or CD8 were found at the baseline of treatment that differentiated responders from nonresponders. Furthermore, mice whose tumors responded to ICB had a lower CD8 PET signal in the spleen and a higher CD4 PET signal in the spleen compared to non-responders. Intratumoral spatial heterogeneity of the CD8 and CD4-specific PET signals was lower in responders compared to non-responders. Finally, PET imaging, autoradiography, and immunofluorescence signals were correlated when comparing in vivo imaging to ex vivo validations.
CD4- and CD8-specific immuno-PET imaging can be used to characterize the in vivo distribution of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells in response to immune checkpoint blockade. Imaging metrics that describe the overall levels and distribution of CD8 + T cells and CD4 + T cells can provide insight into immunological alterations, predict biomarkers of response to immunotherapy, and guide clinical decision-making in those tumors where the kinetics of the response differ.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。