← 返回

多发性骨髓瘤中的异基因干细胞移植:是否仍有一席之地?

英文原题:Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: is there still a place?

查看英文原题

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: is there still a place?

PubMed 2024/06/04(内容时间) Front Oncol Q2 · IF 3.4(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

新型药物的引入显著改善了多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的缓解和治疗结局,并使异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)的使用率大幅下降。

因此,近期指南不再建议将 allo-HSCT 作为新诊断 MM 一线治疗的巩固方案,即使是高危患者也如此。复发/难治性情境下通常也不建议 allo-HSCT,仅应在临床试验中为年轻和高危患者实施。

不过,allo-HSCT 仍是一种潜在治愈方法,数十年来用于治疗 MM 和浆细胞肿瘤并取得良好结局,对经过仔细筛选的患者仍可能是一种治疗选择。尽管 CAR-T 细胞疗法和双特异性抗体治疗三类药物和五类药物暴露后/难治性 MM 已取得良好结果,这些患者仍不可避免地会复发。目前,对于接受新型免疫治疗药物后患者的 allo-HSCT 结局所知较少。

因此,对于 CAR-T 细胞疗法和双特异性抗体治疗后复发的年轻高危患者,以及不适合这些疗法或所在国家尚未提供免疫疗法的患者,allo-HSCT 可能是合理选择。预处理方面,目前建议采用减低强度方案,以降低毒性和死亡率。

此外,近年替代供者、尤其是单倍体供者的使用逐渐增加,其结果与全相合供者相当。最后,在可行情况下,建议实施移植后维持治疗。

展开英文摘要原文

The introduction of novel agents dramatically improved response and outcomes of multiple myeloma (MM) and led to a sharp decline in the use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Thus, recent guidelines do not recommend anymore allo-HSCT as consolidation in the first-line treatment of newly diagnosed MM, even in high-risk patients. In a relapsed/refractory setting, allo-HSCT is not routinely recommended but should only be performed within clinical trials in young and high-risk patients.

Nonetheless, allo-HSCT still represents a potential curative approach that has been used for decades in the treatment of MM and plasma cell neoplasms with favorable results and may still represent a treatment option for carefully selected patients. Despite that promising results were obtained with CAR T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies in triple- and penta-exposed/refractory MM, these patients will inevitably relapse. To date, less is known about outcomes of allo-HSCT in patients exposed to novel immunotherapeutic drugs.

Therefore, allo-HSCT could represent a reasonable treatment choice for younger and high-risk patients who have relapsed after CAR T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies as well as an alternative for patients not eligible to these treatments and in those countries where immunotherapies are not yet available. In the choice of conditioning, reduced intensity conditioning regimens are currently recommended for the lower toxicity and mortality.

Moreover, the use of alternative donors, particularly haploidentical, has progressively increased in last years with results comparable to full matched donors.

Finally, post-transplantation maintenance strategies are encouraged whenever feasible.

论文信息

作者
Liberatore C、Fioritoni F、Di Ianni M
单位
Hematology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Ospedale Santo Spirito, Pescara, Italy.Italy
文献类型
综述
期刊
Frontiers in oncology2024
原文标识
PubMed 38894872 · DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1402106