← 返回

Bempegaldesleukin 联合 Nivolumab 对比 Sunitinib 或 Cabozantinib 治疗既往未治疗的晚期透明细胞肾细胞癌:一项 III 期随机研究(PIVOT-09)

英文原题:Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab Versus Sunitinib or Cabozantinib in Previously Untreated Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Phase III Randomized Study (PIVOT-09).

查看英文原题

Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab Versus Sunitinib or Cabozantinib in Previously Untreated Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Phase III Randomized Study (PIVOT-09).

PubMed 2024/06/05(内容时间) J Clin Oncol Q1 · IF 44.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

一线 BEMPEG 联合 NIVO 治疗晚期/转移性 ccRCC,在中等/低危疾病患者中未改善疗效,但与 TKI 相比,3/4 级 TRAE 更少。

研究思路结论见上方概要

Bempegaldesleukin(BEMPEG)是一种聚乙二醇化白细胞介素(IL)-2细胞因子前药,经工程化设计以提供对临床验证的IL-2通路的可控且持续激活,目标是在肿瘤微环境中优先激活和扩增效应CD8+ T细胞和NK 细胞,而非免疫抑制性调节性T细胞。开放标签、III期随机对照PIVOT-09试验研究了BEMPEG联合nivolumab(NIVO)作为中/高危疾病晚期/转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)一线治疗的疗效和安全性。

既往未接受治疗的晚期/转移性ccRCC患者按1:1随机分配至BEMPEG联合NIVO组,或研究者选择的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI;舒尼替尼或卡博替尼)组。共同主要终点为盲法独立中心审查评估的客观缓解率(ORR)和国际转移性RCC数据库联盟(IMDC)中危/高危疾病患者的总生存期(OS)。

总体而言,623例患者被随机分配至BEMPEG联合NIVO组(n = 311)或TKI组(n = 312;舒尼替尼 n = 225,卡博替尼 n = 87),其中514例(82.5%)患有IMDC中危/高危疾病。在IMDC中危/高危疾病患者中,BEMPEG联合NIVO组与TKI组的ORR分别为23.0%(95% CI,18.0至28.7)与30.6%(95% CI,25.1至36.6;差异,-7.7 [95% CI,-15.2至-0.2];P = .0489),中位OS分别为29.0个月与不可估计(风险比,0.82 [95% CI,0.61至1.10];P = .192)。BEMPEG联合NIVO组相比TKI组更常见的全等级治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)包括发热(32.6% v 2.0%)和瘙痒(31.3% v 8.8%)。3/4级TRAEs在BEMPEG联合NIVO组(25.8%)相比TKI组(56.5%)较少见。

展开英文摘要原文

Bempegaldesleukin (BEMPEG) is a pegylated interleukin (IL)-2 cytokine prodrug engineered to provide controlled and sustained activation of the clinically validated IL-2 pathway, with the goal of preferentially activating and expanding effector CD8 + T cells and natural killer cells over immunosuppressive regulator T cells in the tumor microenvironment. The open-label, phase III randomized controlled PIVOT-09 trial investigated the efficacy and safety of BEMPEG plus nivolumab (NIVO) as first-line treatment for advanced/metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) with intermediate-/poor-risk disease.

Patients with previously untreated advanced/metastatic ccRCC were randomly assigned (1:1) to BEMPEG plus NIVO, or investigator's choice of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI; sunitinib or cabozantinib). Coprimary end points were objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review and overall survival (OS) in patients with International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate-/poor-risk disease.

Overall, 623 patients were randomly assigned to BEMPEG plus NIVO (n = 311) or TKI (n = 312; sunitinib n = 225, cabozantinib n = 87), of whom 514 (82.5%) had IMDC intermediate-/poor-risk disease. In patients with IMDC intermediate-/poor-risk disease, ORR with BEMPEG plus NIVO versus TKI was 23.0% (95% CI, 18.0 to 28.7) versus 30.6% (95% CI, 25.1 to 36.6; difference, -7.7 [95% CI, -15.2 to -0.2]; P = .0489), and median OS was 29.0 months versus not estimable (hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.61 to 1.10]; P = .192), respectively. More frequent all-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with BEMPEG plus NIVO versus TKI included pyrexia (32.6% v 2.0%) and pruritus (31.3% v 8.8%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs were less frequent with BEMPEG plus NIVO (25.8%) versus TKI (56.5%).

First-line BEMPEG plus NIVO for advanced/metastatic ccRCC did not improve efficacy in patients with intermediate-/poor-risk disease but led to fewer grade 3/4 TRAEs versus TKI.

论文信息

作者
Tannir NM、Formiga MN、Penkov K、Kislov N、Vasiliev A、Gunnar Skare N、Hong W、Dai S
第一作者单位
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.United States
通讯作者单位
City of Hope, Duarte, CA.United States
文献类型
III 期临床试验 · 随机对照试验 · 多中心研究 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2024 Aug 10
原文标识
PubMed 38838287 · DOI 10.1200/JCO.23.02082