← 返回

多发性骨髓瘤 CAR-T 细胞治疗后糖皮质激素与托珠单抗使用的预后影响

英文原题:Prognostic impact of corticosteroid and tocilizumab use following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma.

查看英文原题

Prognostic impact of corticosteroid and tocilizumab use following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma.

PubMed 2024/05/27(内容时间) Blood Cancer J Q1 · IF 13.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

尽管托珠单抗(TCZ)和糖皮质激素(CCS)是管理细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)及免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)的主要药物,但有关其对多发性骨髓瘤(MM)嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞疗效影响的数据有限。

本研究旨在评估这些免疫抑制剂对接受 BCMA 或 GPRC5D 靶向 CAR-T 细胞治疗的复发/难治性 MM 患者的预后影响。回顾性队列纳入 2017 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月期间在单一机构接受商业化或研究性自体 CAR-T 细胞产品治疗的患者。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS);次要终点包括总缓解率(ORR)、完全缓解率(CRR)和总生存期(OS)。共分析 101 例患者,其中 91% 接受抗 BCMA CAR-T 细胞治疗,9% 接受抗 GPRC5D CAR-T 细胞治疗。输注后 30 天内,34% 的患者因管理 CRS/ICANS 接受 CCS,49% 接受 TCZ。

中位随访 27.4 个月时,CCS 组与未使用 CCS 组之间(log-rank p=0.35),以及 TCZ 组与未使用 TCZ 组之间(log-rank p=0.69),PFS 均无显著差异。各评估组间 ORR、CRR 和 OS 也相近。在多变量模型中,为管理 CRS/ICANS 而给予 CCS(无论是否联合 TCZ)未对 PFS 产生独立影响(HR=0.74;95% CI,0.36–1.51)。这些发现提示,在复发/难治性 MM 患者中,及时、适当地使用 CCS 或 TCZ 减轻免疫介导毒性,似乎不会影响 CAR-T 细胞疗法的抗肿瘤活性和长期结局。

展开英文摘要原文

Despite being the mainstay of management for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), there is limited data regarding the impact of tocilizumab (TCZ) and corticosteroids (CCS) on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell efficacy in multiple myeloma (MM). The present study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of these immunosuppressants in recipients of BCMA- or GPRC5D-directed CAR T cells for relapsed/refractory MM.

Our retrospective cohort involved patients treated with commercial or investigational autologous CAR T-cell products at a single institution from March 2017-March 2023. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), and overall survival (OS). In total, 101 patients (91% treated with anti-BCMA CAR T cells and 9% treated with anti-GPRC5D CAR T cells) were analyzed.

Within 30 days post-infusion, 34% received CCS and 49% received TCZ for CRS/ICANS management. At a median follow-up of 27. 4 months, no significant difference in PFS was observed between CCS and non-CCS groups (log-rank p = 0. 35) or between TCZ and non-TCZ groups (log-rank p = 0. 69). ORR, CRR, and OS were also comparable between evaluated groups. In our multivariable model, administering CCS with/without TCZ for CRS/ICANS management did not independently influence PFS (HR, 0. 74; 95% CI, 0. 36-1. 51).

These findings suggest that, among patients with relapsed/refractory MM, the timely and appropriate use of CCS or TCZ for mitigating immune-mediated toxicities does not appear to impact the antitumor activity and long-term outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy.

论文信息

作者
Costa BA、Flynn J、Nishimura N、Devlin SM、Farzana T、Rajeeve S、Chung DJ、Landau HJ
第一作者单位
Department of Medicine, Cellular Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Department of Medicine, Cellular Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. mailanks@mskcc.org.United States
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究 · 美国 NIH 资助研究
期刊
Blood cancer journal2024 May 27
原文标识
PubMed 38802346 · DOI 10.1038/s41408-024-01048-0