← 返回

对细胞外结构域激活嵌合抗原受体的审视:靶向多发性骨髓瘤细胞的单域抗体经验凸显逐例优化的必要性

英文原题:Scrutiny of chimeric antigen receptor activation by the extracellular domain: experience with single domain antibodies targeting multiple myeloma cells highlights the need for case-by-case optimization.

查看英文原题

Scrutiny of chimeric antigen receptor activation by the extracellular domain: experience with single domain antibodies targeting multiple myeloma cells highlights the need for case-by-case optimization.

PubMed 2024/04/19(内容时间) Front Immunol Q1 · IF 7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

我们利用针对 CS1(一种与 MM 高度相关的抗原)的 VHH 文库,深入了解了 VHH 在 CAR 环境中的预测参数。

中文摘要

研究生成、筛选并全面表征 CS1 特异性 VHH,评估其体外和体内特性;随后将其纳入第二代 CAR,仅更换抗原结合结构域。通过慢病毒转导表达不同 VHH-CAR 的报告 T 细胞系,并并行评估 CAR-T 活化动力学。研究考察亲和力、细胞结合能力、表位位置、体内行为、结合距离和 CAR-T/MM 细胞相互作用方向,作为预测 CAR-T 活化的参数。

在 MM 体内模型中,VHH 对靶抗原的亲和力可在一定程度上预测其肿瘤示踪能力,亲和力越低,肿瘤摄取总体越少。但亲和力不能预测 CAR-T 活化潜能:部分中等亲和力 VHH 意外地十分有效,而部分高亲和力 VHH 诱导的 T 细胞活化较弱。此现象无法归因于细胞结合能力、VHH 体内行为、表位位置、细胞间距离或结合方向。因此,研究的任何参数都不能显著预测 CAR-T 活化程度。

研究使用针对高度相关 MM 抗原 CS1 的 VHH 文库,获得了 VHH 在 CAR 背景下预测参数的相关见解。由于所研究的 VHH 参数均无预测价值,确定可实现最佳 CAR-T 活化的 VHH 仍需依赖经验筛选。研究结果强调同时筛选多个候选物的重要性。

展开英文摘要原文

CS1-specific VHHs were generated, identified and fully characterized, in vitro and in vivo . Next, they were incorporated into second-generation CARs that only differ in their antigen-binding moiety. Reporter T-cell lines were lentivirally transduced with the different VHH-CARs and CAR-T cell activation kinetics were evaluated side-by-side. Affinity, cell-binding capacity, epitope location, in vivo behavior, binding distance, and orientation of the CAR-T:MM cell interaction pair were investigated as predictive parameters for CAR-T cell activation.

Our data show that the VHHs affinity for its target antigen is relatively predictive for its in vivo tumor-tracing capacity, as tumor uptake generally decreased with decreasing affinity in an in vivo model of MM. This does not hold true for their CAR-T cell activation potential, as some intermediate affinity-binding VHHs proved surprisingly potent, while some higher affinity VHHs failed to induce equal levels of T-cell activation. This could not be attributed to cell-binding capacity, in vivo VHH behavior, epitope location, cell-to-cell distance or binding orientation. Hence, none of the investigated parameters proved to have significant predictive value for the extent of CAR-T cell activation.

We gained insight into the predictive parameters of VHHs in the CAR-context using a VHH library against CS1, a highly relevant MM antigen. As none of the studied VHH parameters had predictive value, defining VHHs for optimal CAR-T cell activation remains bound to serendipity. These findings highlight the importance of screening multiple candidates.

论文信息

作者
Hanssens H、Meeus F、De Vlaeminck Y、Lecocq Q、Puttemans J、Debie P、De Groof TWM、Goyvaerts C
单位
Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and Therapy (MITH), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.Belgium
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Frontiers in immunology2024
原文标识
PubMed 38720898 · DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1389018