CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Scrutiny of chimeric antigen receptor activation by the extracellular domain: experience with single domain antibodies targeting multiple myeloma cells highlights the need for case-by-case optimization.
Scrutiny of chimeric antigen receptor activation by the extracellular domain: experience with single domain antibodies targeting multiple myeloma cells highlights the need for case-by-case optimization.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
我们利用针对 CS1(一种与 MM 高度相关的抗原)的 VHH 文库,深入了解了 VHH 在 CAR 环境中的预测参数。
研究生成、筛选并全面表征 CS1 特异性 VHH,评估其体外和体内特性;随后将其纳入第二代 CAR,仅更换抗原结合结构域。通过慢病毒转导表达不同 VHH-CAR 的报告 T 细胞系,并并行评估 CAR-T 活化动力学。研究考察亲和力、细胞结合能力、表位位置、体内行为、结合距离和 CAR-T/MM 细胞相互作用方向,作为预测 CAR-T 活化的参数。
在 MM 体内模型中,VHH 对靶抗原的亲和力可在一定程度上预测其肿瘤示踪能力,亲和力越低,肿瘤摄取总体越少。但亲和力不能预测 CAR-T 活化潜能:部分中等亲和力 VHH 意外地十分有效,而部分高亲和力 VHH 诱导的 T 细胞活化较弱。此现象无法归因于细胞结合能力、VHH 体内行为、表位位置、细胞间距离或结合方向。因此,研究的任何参数都不能显著预测 CAR-T 活化程度。
研究使用针对高度相关 MM 抗原 CS1 的 VHH 文库,获得了 VHH 在 CAR 背景下预测参数的相关见解。由于所研究的 VHH 参数均无预测价值,确定可实现最佳 CAR-T 活化的 VHH 仍需依赖经验筛选。研究结果强调同时筛选多个候选物的重要性。
CS1-specific VHHs were generated, identified and fully characterized, in vitro and in vivo . Next, they were incorporated into second-generation CARs that only differ in their antigen-binding moiety. Reporter T-cell lines were lentivirally transduced with the different VHH-CARs and CAR-T cell activation kinetics were evaluated side-by-side. Affinity, cell-binding capacity, epitope location, in vivo behavior, binding distance, and orientation of the CAR-T:MM cell interaction pair were investigated as predictive parameters for CAR-T cell activation.
Our data show that the VHHs affinity for its target antigen is relatively predictive for its in vivo tumor-tracing capacity, as tumor uptake generally decreased with decreasing affinity in an in vivo model of MM. This does not hold true for their CAR-T cell activation potential, as some intermediate affinity-binding VHHs proved surprisingly potent, while some higher affinity VHHs failed to induce equal levels of T-cell activation. This could not be attributed to cell-binding capacity, in vivo VHH behavior, epitope location, cell-to-cell distance or binding orientation. Hence, none of the investigated parameters proved to have significant predictive value for the extent of CAR-T cell activation.
We gained insight into the predictive parameters of VHHs in the CAR-context using a VHH library against CS1, a highly relevant MM antigen. As none of the studied VHH parameters had predictive value, defining VHHs for optimal CAR-T cell activation remains bound to serendipity. These findings highlight the importance of screening multiple candidates.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。