← 返回

CAR-T 细胞治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤和实体瘤的经济学评价:系统综述

英文原题:Economic Evaluations of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies for Hematologic and Solid Malignancies: A Systematic Review.

查看英文原题

Economic Evaluations of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies for Hematologic and Solid Malignancies: A Systematic Review.

PubMed 2024/04/17(内容时间) Value Health Q1 · IF 6.2(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

与对照相比,CAR-T 疗法费用更高、产生的质量调整生命年(QALYs)更多,但其成本效果不确定,且取决于患者人群、癌症类型和模型假设。

中文摘要

本研究旨在系统综述癌症患者CAR-T 细胞疗法成本效益的相关证据。

于2022年10月检索电子数据库,并于2023年9月更新检索。纳入比较癌症患者CAR-T 疗法成本和效果的系统综述、卫生技术评估及经济学评价。两名评审员独立筛选研究、提取数据、综合结果,并使用Philips清单对研究进行批判性评价。成本数据以2022年美元表示。

检索获得1,809条记录,最终纳入47项研究。多数研究为成本效用分析,发表于2018至2023年,且在美国开展。研究将tisagenlecleucel、axicabtagene ciloleucel、idecabtagene vicleucel、ciltacabtagene autoleucel、lisocabtagene maraleucel、brexucabtagene autoleucel和relmacabtagene autoleucel与多种标准治疗化疗方案进行比较。成人CAR-T 疗法每质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比(ICER)范围为9,424至4,124,105美元;儿科患者为20,784至243,177美元。延长时间范围或假设更早达到治愈状态时,ICER有所改善。多数研究未达到Philips清单要求,原因是缺乏头对头比较,且CAR-T 成本和治愈效应存在不确定性。

与对照疗法相比,CAR-T 疗法成本更高且产生更多QALY,但其成本效益仍不确定,并取决于患者群体、癌症类型和模型假设。这凸显了开展更精细经济学评价以及持续研究的必要性,以更好理解CAR-T 疗法对不同患者群体的价值。

展开英文摘要原文

This study aimed to systematically review evidence on the cost-effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies for patients with cancer.

Electronic databases were searched in October 2022 and updated in September 2023. Systematic reviews, health technology assessments, and economic evaluations that compared costs and effects of CAR-T therapy in patients with cancer were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, synthesized results, and critically appraised studies using the Philips checklist. Cost data were presented in 2022 US dollars.

Our search yielded 1809 records, 47 of which were included. Most of included studies were cost-utility analysis, published between 2018 and 2023, and conducted in the United States. Tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, idecabtagene vicleucel, ciltacabtagene autoleucel, lisocabtagene maraleucel, brexucabtagene autoleucel, and relmacabtagene autoleucel were compared with various standard of care chemotherapies. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for CAR-T therapies ranged from $9424 to $4 124 105 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in adults and from $20 784 to $243 177 per QALY in pediatric patients. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were found to improve over longer time horizons or when an earlier cure point was assumed. Most studies failed to meet the Philips checklist due to a lack of head-to-head comparisons and uncertainty surrounding CAR-T costs and curative effects.

CAR-T therapies were more expensive and generated more QALYs than comparators, but their cost-effectiveness was uncertain and dependent on patient population, cancer type, and model assumptions. This highlights the need for more nuanced economic evaluations and continued research to better understand the value of CAR-T therapies in diverse patient populations.

论文信息

作者
Thavorn K、Thompson ER、Kumar S、Heiskanen A、Agarwal A、Atkins H、Shorr R、Hawrysh T
单位
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, General Campus, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Electronic address: kthavorn@ohri.ca.Canada
文献类型
系统综述 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2024 Aug
原文标识
PubMed 38641057 · DOI 10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.004