不适合移植的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线使用 axicabtagene ciloleucel:ALYCANTE 最终分析
Second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for transplantation: ALYCANTE final analysis.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Cost-effectiveness analysis 3L of axicabtagene ciloleucel vs tisagenlecleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel in Japan.
Cost-effectiveness analysis 3L of axicabtagene ciloleucel vs tisagenlecleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel in Japan.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
进行成本效果分析(CEA),比较 axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel)与 tisagenlecleucel(tisa-cel)和 lisocabtagene(liso-cel)在日本成人患者中用于≥2线治疗后复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤治疗的成本效果。
使用基于 ZUMA-1 试验的分区生存混合治愈模型进行成本效果分析,并通过匹配调整间接比较对 JULIET 和 TRANSCEND 试验进行调整。结果与结论:与 tisa-cel 和 liso-cel 相比,axi-cel 与更高的增量生命年(3.13 和 2.85)和增量质量调整生命年(2.65 和 2.24)相关,因此产生的增量直接医疗成本更低(-$976.29 [-¥137,657] 和 -$242.00 [-¥34,122])。从日本支付方角度看,与 tisa-cel 和 liso-cel 相比,axi-cel 是具有成本效果的选项。[框:见正文]。
Aim: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed to compare axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) and lisocabtagene (liso-cel) for treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in adult patients after ≥2 lines of therapy in Japan. Materials & methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using the partition survival mixture cure model based on the ZUMA-1 trial and adjusted to the JULIET and TRANSCEND trials using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons.
Results & conclusion: Axi-cel was associated with greater incremental life years (3. 13 and 2. 85) and incremental quality-adjusted life-years (2. 65 and 2. 24), thus generated lower incremental direct medical costs (-$976. 29 [-¥137,657] and -$242. 00 [-¥34,122]), compared with tisa-cel and liso-cel. Axi-cel was cost-effective option compared with tisa-cel and liso-cel from a Japanese payer's perspective. [Box: see text].
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。