← 返回

基于国际随机 III 期临床试验的 TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)治疗晚期黑色素瘤的成本效果

英文原题:Cost-effectiveness of treating advanced melanoma with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes based on an international randomized phase 3 clinical trial.

查看英文原题

Cost-effectiveness of treating advanced melanoma with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes based on an international randomized phase 3 clinical trial.

PubMed 2024/03/26(内容时间) J Immunother Cancer Q1 · IF 11.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

基于一项随机 3 期试验的数据,在目前荷兰和丹麦背景下,对不可切除的 IIIC-IV 期黑色素瘤患者采用 TIL-NKI/CCIT 治疗既具有成本效益又可节省成本。这些发现促使 TIL-NKI/CCIT 被纳入保险覆盖的医疗服务范围和治療指南。TIL-NKI/CCIT 细胞疗法的公共资助开发显示出切实现实的前景,可进一步探索有效个体化治疗的开发,同时保障医疗系统的经济可持续性。

研究思路结论见上方概要

在荷兰和丹麦开展的一项多中心、开放标签、随机3期临床试验中,与ipilimumab相比,使用来源于自体黑色素瘤肿瘤的体外扩增TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TIL-NKI/CCIT)治疗,改善了不可切除IIIC-IV期黑色素瘤患者在一线或二线治疗失败后的无进展生存期。基于该试验,我们进行了成本-效用分析。

构建了一个Markov决策模型,用于估计在荷兰TIL-NKI/CCIT对比ipilimumab的预期成本(以2021年表示)和结局(质量调整生命年(QALYs))。在情景分析中评估了丹麦情景。采用改良的社会视角,时间范围为终生。TIL-NKI/CCIT生产成本通过作业成本法估计。通过敏感性分析,评估了不确定性及其对增量成本效果比(ICER)的影响。

平均总未贴现终生获益为 TIL-NKI/CCIT 的 4.47 生命年(LYs)和 3.52 QALYs,而 ipilimumab 为 3.33 LYs 和 2.46 QALYs。荷兰的总终生未贴现成本 TIL-NKI/CCIT 为 347,168(包括 67,547 的生产成本),而 ipilimumab 为 433,634。丹麦情景下的未贴现终生成本分别为 337,309 和 436,135。这使得 TIL-NKI/CCIT 在两个国家相比 ipilimumab 均处于优势地位,意味着以更低的成本获得了增量 QALYs。生存概率以及疾病进展状态下的效用对 ICER 影响最大。

展开英文摘要原文

A Markov decision model was constructed to estimate expected costs (expressed in 2021 ) and outcomes (quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)) of TIL-NKI/CCIT versus ipilimumab in the Netherlands. The Danish setting was assessed in a scenario analysis. A modified societal perspective was applied over a lifetime horizon. TIL-NKI/CCIT production costs were estimated via activity-based costing. Through sensitivity analyses, uncertainties and their impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were assessed.

Mean total undiscounted lifetime benefits were 4.47 life years (LYs) and 3.52 QALYs for TIL-NKI/CCIT and 3.33 LYs and 2.46 QALYs for ipilimumab. Total lifetime undiscounted costs in the Netherlands were 347,168 for TIL-NKI/CCIT (including 67,547 for production costs) compared with 433,634 for ipilimumab. Undiscounted lifetime cost in the Danish scenario were 337,309 and 436,135, respectively. This resulted in a dominant situation for TIL-NKI/CCIT compared with ipilimumab in both countries, meaning incremental QALYs were gained at lower costs. Survival probabilities, and utility in progressive disease affected the ICER most.

Based on the data of a randomized phase 3 trial, treatment with TIL-NKI/CCIT in patients with unresectable stage IIIC-IV melanoma is cost-effective and cost-saving, both in the current Dutch and Danish setting. These findings led to inclusion of TIL-NKI/CCIT as insured care and treatment guidelines. Publicly funded development of the TIL-NKI/CCIT cell therapy shows realistic promise to further explore development of effective personalized treatment while warranting economic sustainability of healthcare systems.

论文信息

作者
Ten Ham RMT、Rohaan MW、Jedema I、Kessels R、Stegeman W、Scheepmaker W、Nuijen B、Nijenhuis C
第一作者单位
Department of Epidemiology & Health Economics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Netherlands
通讯作者单位
Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands V.retel@nki.nl.Netherlands
文献类型
随机对照试验 · 多中心研究 · III 期临床试验 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer2024 Mar 26
原文标识
PubMed 38531663 · DOI 10.1136/jitc-2023-008372