← 返回

利用三培养 3D 球体模型理解胶质母细胞瘤基质屏障对 NK 细胞攻击的抵抗作用

英文原题:Understanding glioblastoma stromal barriers against NK cell attack using tri-culture 3D spheroid model.

查看英文原题

Understanding glioblastoma stromal barriers against NK cell attack using tri-culture 3D spheroid model.

PubMed 2024/01/20(内容时间) Heliyon

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)是一种高度侵袭性的肿瘤类型,生存率极低,其不良预后至少部分归因于癌细胞与肿瘤微环境细胞(如星形胶质细胞和小胶质细胞)之间的相互作用。我们旨在利用3D共培养体系揭示这些细胞对GBM进展及细胞疗法的影响。将胶质母细胞瘤细胞与患者来源的星形胶质细胞或小胶质细胞或两者共培养,形成了致密且异质性的球体。星形胶质细胞和小胶质细胞均增强了球体的生长速率,并形成了阻碍大分子穿透的物理屏障,而仅星形胶质细胞增强了迁移能力。有趣的是,双培养/三培养球体对NK-92细胞表现出显著的耐药性,这可能归因于致密的基质以及免疫抑制基因如IDO1或PTGES2的诱导表达。总之,我们新型的3D GBM球体模型再现了人胶质母细胞瘤的细胞间相互作用,可作为评估癌症治疗方法的合适平台。

展开英文摘要原文

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), a highly aggressive tumor type with a dismal survival rate, has a poor outcome which is at least partly attributed to the crosstalk between cancer cells and cells from the tumor microenvironment such as astrocytes and microglia.

We aimed to decipher the effect of these cells on GBM progression and on cell-based therapies using 3D co-cultures. Co-culturing of glioblastoma cells with patient-derived astrocytes or microglia or both formed dense and heterogeneous spheroids. Both, astrocytes and microglia, enhanced the spheroid growth rate and formed a physical barrier for macromolecules penetration, while only astrocytes enhanced the migration.

Interestingly bi-/tri-cultured spheroids showed significant resistance against NK-92 cells, likely attributed to dense stroma and induced expression of immunosuppressive genes such as IDO1 or PTGES2. Altogether, our novel 3D GBM spheroid model recapitulates the cell-to-cell interactions of human glioblastoma and can serve as a suitable platform for evaluating cancer therapeutics.

论文信息

作者
Heinrich MA、Huynh NT、Heinrich L、Prakash J
单位
Department of Advanced Organ Bioengineering & Therapeutics, Engineered Therapeutics Section, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, 7500AE, Enschede, the Netherlands.Netherlands
期刊
Heliyon2024 Feb 15
原文标识
PubMed 38317968 · DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24808