CD81 通过阻断 CD274/PD-L1 的选择性自噬降解驱动放射抵抗性胶质母细胞瘤的免疫逃逸
CD81 drives immune evasion in radioresistant glioblastoma by blocking selective autophagic degradation of CD274/PD-L1.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Compartmentalized drug localization studies in extracellular vesicles for anticancer therapy.
Compartmentalized drug localization studies in extracellular vesicles for anticancer therapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
在治疗性细胞外囊泡(EV)的开发中,与合成纳米药物相比,药物包封效率明显较低。这是由于EV膜的层级结构以及候选药物的理化性质(分子量、亲水性、亲脂性等)所致。作为概念验证,我们展示了药物在EV中的区室定位是影响载药EV治疗潜力的另一个重要参数。
我们以人脂肪间充质干细胞(hADSC)来源EV为对象,比较同一种化疗分子的两种制剂——游离多柔比星(DOX)和1,2-二硬脂酰-sn-甘油-3-磷酸乙醇胺(DSPE)脂质偶联多柔比星(L-DOX)——的载药情况,以增强细胞内摄取和治疗效力。结合纳米表面能量转移(NSET)、分子模拟技术及冷冻透射电子显微镜(cryo-TEM)分析,我们证实这两种分子在hADSC EV中的区室定位不同。由于脂溶性较高,L-DOX优先吸附于EV表面,而游离DOX主要包封在EV核心内。在相同输入药物质量下,载L-DOX的EV(LDOX@EV)所含DOX量几乎是载游离DOX的EV(DOX@EV)的3倍。细胞实验显示,L-DOX@EV的细胞内化程度高于DOX@EV。与游离L-DOX相比,表面区室化的L-DOX@EV显示出极具前景的治疗潜力提升,可用于克服许多潜在药物本身不可透膜的问题。
总体而言,本研究阐明药物在EV中的区室定位十分重要,并说明其如何影响细胞内递送、载药效率和治疗效果,为今后系统研究基于EV的个体化生物治疗递送平台奠定基础。
In the development of therapeutic extracellular vesicles (EVs), drug encapsulation efficiencies are significantly lower when compared with synthetic nanomedicines. This is due to the hierarchical structure of the EV membrane and the physicochemical properties of the candidate drug (molecular weight, hydrophilicity, lipophilicity, and so on). As a proof of concept, here we demonstrated the importance of drug compartmentalization in EVs as an additional parameter affecting the therapeutic potential of drug-loaded EVs. In human adipose mesenchymal stem cell (hADSC) derived EVs, we performed a comparative drug loading analysis using two formulations of the same chemotherapeutic molecule - free doxorubicin (DOX) and 1,2-distearoyl- sn-glycero -3-phosphoethanolamine (DSPE) lipid-conjugated doxorubicin (L-DOX) - to enhance the intracellular uptake and therapeutic efficacy.
By nano surface energy transfer (NSET) and molecular simulation techniques, along with cryo-TEM analysis, we confirmed the differential compartmentalization of these two molecules in hADSC EVs. L-DOX was preferentially adsorbed onto the surface of the EV, due to its higher lipophilicity, whereas free DOX was mostly encapsulated within the EV core. Also, the L-DOX loaded EV (LDOX@EV) returned an almost three-fold higher DOX content as compared to the free DOX loaded EV (DOX@EV), for a given input mass of drug.
Based on the cellular investigations, L-DOX@EV showed higher cell internalization than DOX@EV. Also, in comparison with free L-DOX, the magnitude of therapeutic potential enhancement displayed by the surface compartmentalized L-DOX@EV is highly promising and can be exploited to overcome the sensitivity of many potential drugs, which are impermeable in nature.
Overall, this study illustrates the significance of drug compartmentalization in EVs and how this could affect intracellular delivery, loading efficiency, and therapeutic effect. This will further lay the foundation for the future systematic investigation of EV-based biotherapeutic delivery platforms for personalized medicine.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。